Affiliation:
1. Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, I.P. (LNEG), Unidade de Bioenergia e Biorrefinarias, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar 22, Edif. F, R/C, 1649-038 Lisbon, Portugal
2. A4F—Algae for Future, Campus do Lumiar, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar 22, Edif. E, R/C, 1649-038 Lisbon, Portugal
Abstract
Microalgae represent a promising solution in addressing the impacts associated with the current agricultural and manufacturing practices which are causing irreparable environmental damage. Microalgae have considerable biosynthetic potential, being a rich source of lipids, proteins, and high-value compounds. Under the scope of the H2020-BBI MULTI-STR3AM project, an innovative large-scale production system of valuable commodities for the food, feed, and fragrance sectors is being developed on the basis of microalgae, reducing costs, increasing the scale of production, and boosting value chain sustainability. In this work, we aimed to create a process model that can mimic an industrial plant to estimate mass and energy balances, optimize scheduling, and calculate production costs for a large-scale plant. Three autotrophic microalgae strains (Nannochloropsis sp., Dunaliella sp. and Spirulina sp.) were considered for this assessment, as well as the use of locally sourced CO2 (flue gas). The developed process model is a useful tool for obtaining the data required for techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of industrial biorefinery-based processes. Nannochloropsis sp. was the most economic option, whereas Dunaliella sp. was the most expensive strain to produce due to its lower productivity. Preliminary environmental assessments of the climate change impact category revealed that water recirculation and the use of flue gas could lead to values of 5.6, 10.6, and 9.2 kgCO2eq·kgAFDW−1 for Nannochloropsis sp., Dunaliella sp., and Spirulina sp., respectively, with electricity and NaCl as the main contributors. The obtained data allow for the quantification of the production costs and environmental impacts of the microalgal biomass fractions produced, which will be fundamental for future comparison studies and in determining if they are higher or lower than those of the replaced products. The process model developed in this work provides a useful tool for the evaluation and optimization of large-scale microalgae production systems.
Funder
European Union
European Regional Development Fund
Subject
Plant Science,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous),Food Science
Reference36 articles.
1. Biomass for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: An Overview of World Biomass Production and Utilization;Antar;Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,2021
2. Ferreira, A., and Gouveia, L. (2020). Handbook of Microalgae Based Processes and Products, Elsevier.
3. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Microalgae Cultivation for Non-Energy Purposes Using Different Carbon Dioxide Sources;Porcelli;Sci. Total Environ.,2020
4. Distinct Microalgae Species for Food—Part 1: A Methodological (Top-down) Approach for the Life Cycle Assessment of Microalgae Cultivation in Tubular Photobioreactors;Schade;J. Appl. Phycol.,2020
5. Distinct Microalgae Species for Food—Part 2: Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Microalgae and Fish for Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA), Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA), and Protein;Schade;J. Appl. Phycol.,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献