Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculants on the fermentation quality, microbial compositions, and predicted functional profiles of forage oat. The forage oat was inoculated with distilled water, Lentilactobacillus buchneri (LB), and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (LP) as the control (CON), LB and LP treatments, respectively, and the addition of Lentilactobacillus buchneri (LB) or Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (LP) resulted in 1 × 106 colony-forming units/g of fresh weight. After 30 days of fermentation, the lowest pH (4.23) and the lowest content of ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3-N) in dry matter (DM, 4.39%) were observed in the LP treatment. Interestingly, there was a significant (p < 0.05) difference in lactic acid (LA) concentration among the three treatments. The LP treatment had the highest lactate concentration (7.49% DM). At the same time, a markedly (p < 0.05) elevated acetic acid (AA) concentration (2.48% DM) was detected in the LB treatment. The Shannon and Chao1 indexes of bacterial and fungal communities in all the silage samples decreased compared to those in the fresh materials (FM). Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum in the FM group and shifted from Proteobacteria to Firmicutes after ensiling. Lactobacillus (64.87%) and Weissella (18.93%) were the predominant genera in the CON, whereas Lactobacillus dominated the fermentation process in the LB (94.65%) and LP (99.60%) treatments. For the fungal community structure, the major genus was Apiotrichum (21.65% and 60.66%) in the FM and CON groups after 30 days of fermentation. Apiotrichum was the most predominant in the LB and LP treatments, accounting for 52.54% and 34.47%, respectively. The genera Lactococcus, Pediococcus, and Weissella were negatively associated with the LA content. The genus Ustilago and Bulleromyces were positively associated with the LA content. These results suggest that the addition of LAB regulated the microbial community in oat silage, which influenced the ensiling products, and LP was more beneficial for decreasing the pH and NH3-N and increasing the LA concentration than LB in forage oat silage.
Funder
Selection and mechanism of low temperature resistant lactic acid bacteria in natural forage silage in Hulunbuir
Subject
Plant Science,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous),Food Science
Reference71 articles.
1. Xiong, Y., Xu, J., Guo, L., Chen, F., Jiang, D., Lin, Y., Guo, C., Li, X., Chen, Y., and Ni, K. (2022). Exploring the Effects of Different Bacteria Additives on Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community and In Vitro Gas Production of Forage Oat Silage. Animals, 12.
2. Yield and quality properties of silage maize and their influencing factors in China;Zhao;Sci. China Life Sci.,2022
3. Exploring the bacterial community and fermentation characteristics during silage fermentation of abandoned fresh tea leaves;Lin;Chemosphere,2021
4. The correlations and spatial characteristics of microbiome and silage quality by reusing of citrus waste in a family-scale bunker silo;Zhou;J. Clean. Prod.,2019
5. Muck, R.E., and Kung, L. (1997, January 11–13). Effect of silage additives on ensiling. In Proceedings from the Silage: Field to Feedbunk North American Conference. Hershey, PA, USA. NRAES-99.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献