Predictive Clinical and Biological Criteria for Gene Panel Positivity in Suspected Inherited Autoinflammatory Diseases: Insights from a Case–Control Study

Author:

Heiser Lionel1,Broly Martin1,Rittore Cécile1,Touitou Isabelle12ORCID,Georgin-Lavialle Sophie3,Boursier Guilaine12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratoire de Génétique des Maladies Rares et Autoinflammatoires, Service de Génétique Moléculaire et Cytogénomique, National Reference Center for Autoinflammatory Diseases and AA Amyloidosis, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France

2. Stem Cells, Cellular Plasticity, Regenerative Medicine and Immunotherapies, INSERM, 34295 Montpellier, France

3. Tenon Hospital, Centre de Référence des Maladies Auto-Inflammatoires et des Amyloses Inflammatoire (CEREMAIA), Internal Medicine Department, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France

Abstract

In order to assess the clinical and biological criteria that predict gene panel positivity in patients with a suspected inherited genetic autoinflammatory disease, we conducted a case–control study. These new selection criteria could replace the national multidisciplinary staff approval before performing genetic testing that has been required since 2019. The study involved 119 positive gene panels matched by panel sizes to 119 randomly selected negative gene panels. The patients were referred to our laboratory for genetic testing between June 2012, and March 2023. The clinical and biological criteria were extracted from a prospectively filled database. We focused our evaluation on accuracy and the positive predictive value. Neonatal symptom onset and deafness had the highest accuracies among all criteria associated with the positivity panel, with 92.9% (88.6; 96.0) and 92.6% (88.5; 95.6), respectively. However, it is important to note that the associated Positive Predictive Values (PPVs) cannot exceed 50%. Despite finding a statistical association between clinical and biological criteria and panel positivity, the predictive values of these criteria were not sufficient to recommend Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) gene panel testing without the national multidisciplinary staff evaluation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3