Abstract
Electoral systems are modified by individuals who have incentives to bias the rules for their political advantage (i.e., gerrymandering). To prevent gerrymandering, legislative institutions can rely on mathematical tools to guarantee democratic fairness and territorial contiguity. These tools have been successfully used in the past; however, there is a need to accommodate additional meanings of the term fairness within the electoral systems of modern democracies. In this paper, we present an optimization framework that considers multiple criteria for drawing districts and assigning the number of representatives. Besides some typical districting criteria (malapportionment and contiguity), we introduce novel criteria for ensuring territorial equilibrium and incentives for candidates to deploy their representation efforts fairly during their campaign and period in office. We test the method, which we denote as Multi-criteria Pen, in a recent and a forthcoming reform of the Chilean electoral system. The results show the potential of our tool to improve the current territorial design and offers insights on the motivations, objectives, and deficiencies of both reform plans.
Subject
General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference92 articles.
1. The Politics of Electoral Systems;Gallagher,2005
2. Disproportionality and malapportionment: Measuring electoral inequity
3. Legislative Malapportionment in Latin America: Historical and Comparative Perspectives;Snyder,2004
4. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems;Taagepera,1989
5. The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献