Equivalent Modes of Reimbursement in Augmented Contests

Author:

Cohen Chen1,Darioshi Roy1ORCID,Nitzan Shmuel2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Policy and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel

2. Department of Economics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel

Abstract

This article presents an equivalence theorem in the context of Tullock’s augmented lottery contest with external or internal cost reimbursement. Three alternative modes of reimbursement are studied. The equivalence implies that, even though the augmented contest is vulnerable to framing biases, it is strategically neutral.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Statistics and Probability

Reference17 articles.

1. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice;Tversky;Science,1981

2. Information in Tullock contests;Aiche;Theory Decis.,2019

3. Buchanan, J.M., Tollison, R., and Tullock, G. (1980). Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, Texas A&M University Press.

4. Heterogeneity, leveling the playing field, and affirmative action in contests;Chowdhury;South. Econ. J.,2023

5. Fu, Q., and Wu, Z. (2019). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance, Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3