Affiliation:
1. Textile Protection and Comfort Center (TPACC), Wilson College of Textiles, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
Abstract
Firefighters are exposed to hazardous chemicals at fire scenes, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) among many others, which pose significant health risks. Current laundering practices are ineffective at removing persistent contaminants from turnout gear, necessitating further research to optimize cleaning methods. This study explores the impact of presoaking prior to the laundering process and the factors that can affect its effectiveness, including the presoaking duration and detergent concentration, in PAH removal when laundering. For this, contaminated fabric swatches were subjected to various presoaking durations (1, 3, and 12 h) and detergent concentrations (99:1 and 90:10 water-to-detergent ratios) before undergoing bench-scale washing. The cleaning efficacy was assessed for 16 PAH compounds, including both low-molecular-weight (LMW) PAHs and high-molecular-weight (HMW) PAHs. Moreover, the removal mechanisms of PAHs from turnout gear were fundamentally explained using partition coefficients and standard affinities with different parameters during washing. The results demonstrate that 3 h and 12 h of presoaking lead to 2.8 and 4.3 times greater HMW PAH removal, respectively. After 12 h of presoaking in a 90:10 water-to-detergent ratio, 97% of the LMW PAHs and 78% of the HMW PAHs were removed, compared to only an 11% removal of the HMW PAHs with a 99:1 ratio. Additionally, direct washing with a 90:10 ratio achieved comparable efficacy to that of presoaking with the same water-to-detergent ratio, indicating the crucial role of detergent concentration during laundering. These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing firefighter safety practices, emphasizing the role of presoaking and the appropriate methods to perform presoaking to mitigate firefighters’ occupational exposure risks to toxic substances and ensure gear reliability.
Funder
US Department of Homeland Security
Wildfire Conservancy
North Carolina State University
Reference45 articles.
1. Sawka, M., Wenger, B., Scott, M., Kolka, M.A., Bettencourt, B., Flinn, S., Gardner, J., Matthew, W.T., Lovell, M., and Scott, C. (2003). Heat Stress Control and Heat Casualty Management, Department of the Army and Air Force.
2. Cook, B., and Mitchell, W. (2013). Occupational Health Effects for Firefighters: The Extent and Implications of Physical and Psychological Injuries, Centre of Full Employment and Equity.
3. Exposure–response relationships for select cancer and non–cancer health outcomes in a cohort of US firefighters from San Francisco, Chicago and Philadelphia (1950–2009);Daniels;Occup. Environ. Med.,2015
4. Cancer incidence and mortality in firefighters: A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis;Soteriades;Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.,2019
5. Cancer risks of firefighters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of secular trends and region-specific differences;Casjens;Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health,2020