Evaluation of the Safety of Cosmetic Ingredients and Their Skin Compatibility through In Silico and In Vivo Assessments of a Newly Developed Eye Serum
Author:
Juncan Anca Maria123ORCID, Rus Luca-Liviu3ORCID, Morgovan Claudiu3ORCID, Loghin Felicia1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Pasteur Str., 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2. SC Aviva Cosmetics SRL, 71A Kövari Str., 400217 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 3. Preclinic Department, Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, 2A Lucian Blaga Str., 550169 Sibiu, Romania
Abstract
The term “risk assessment” is often substituted with “safety assessment”, to demonstrate the safe properties of cosmetic ingredients and formulations. With respect to the actual legislative framework, the proper use of in silico evaluation could offer a representative non-animal substitute for the toxicity evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. The in silico assessment needs to be integrated with other lines of proof (in vitro and/or in vivo data) in the form of a complex methodology in order to demonstrate the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients/products. The present study aimed to develop and characterize a new cosmetic formulation, designed for the skin care of the periorbital area. Quality control comprising stability, physicochemical, and microbiological evaluation was performed. Another objective of this study was to present a screening model for the safety evaluation of the cosmetic formulation by identifying individual ingredients, and to confirm the skin compatibility based on in vivo evaluation. The results demonstrated the in silico and in vivo safety profile of the cosmetic ingredients used in the present formulation. In silico evaluation, using a novel, specific software applicable for the risk evaluation of ingredients and formulations, showed that the incorporated ingredients were non-mutagenic and non-sensitizing, and considering the margin of safety (MoS), the cosmetic raw materials could be considered safe. Skin compatibility was confirmed by the patch test performed under dermatological control, evidencing the “non-irritating” potential of the developed cosmetic formulation.
Funder
Ministry of Regional Development, Public Administration and European Funds
Reference63 articles.
1. Ferreira, M., Matos, A., Couras, A., Marto, J., and Ribeiro, H. (2022). Overview of Cosmetic Regulatory Frameworks around the World. Cosmetics, 9. 2. (2024, February 17). Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on Cosmetic Products. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R0655. 3. Renner, G., Audebert, F., Burfeindt, J., Calvet, B., Caratas-Perifan, M., Leal, M.E., Gorni, R., Long, A., Meredith, E., and O’Sullivan, Ú. (2017). Cosmetics Europe Guidelines on the Management of Undesirable Effects and Reporting of Serious Undesirable Effects from Cosmetics in the European Union. Cosmetics, 4. 4. Application of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy for the Characterization of 525 Sustainable Cosmetics and Ingredients with Antioxidant Potential;Juncan;Environ. Eng. Manag. J.,2014 5. Non-Animal Skin Sensitization Safety Assessments for Cosmetic Ingredients—What Is Possible Today?;Goebel;Curr. Opin. Toxicol.,2017
|
|