Elucidating Amendment Resources for Reclaiming Efficacy of Sodic Soils around Abaya and Chamo Lakes, South Ethiopia Rift Valley
Author:
Walche Azmera12ORCID, Haile Wassie2, Kiflu Alemayehu2, Tsegaye Dereje1
Affiliation:
1. College of Agricultural Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch P.O. Box 21, Ethiopia 2. College of Agriculture, Hawassa University, Hawassa P.O. Box 05, Ethiopia
Abstract
Background: Sodic soils are harmful to agricultural and natural environments in Ethiopia’s semi-arid and arid regions, leading to soil degradation and reduced productivity. This study investigated how amendment resources could help improve the chemical properties of sodic soils around the Abaya and Chamo Lakes in the South Ethiopia Rift Valley. Methods: A factorial experiment was conducted to study the effects of gypsum (GYP) and farmyard manure (FYM) on sodic soil reclamation. The experiment had four levels of GYP (0, 50, 100, and 150%) and four levels of FYM (0, 10, 20, and 30 tons ha−1), with three replications. The pots were incubated for three months and leached for one month, after which soil samples were collected and analyzed for chemical properties. ANOVA was performed to determine the optimal amendment level for sodic soil reclamation. Results: The study found that applying 10 ton FYM ha−1 and gypsum at 100% gypsum required (GR) rate resulted in a 99.8% decrease in exchangeable sodium percentages (ESP) compared to untreated composite sodic soil and a 1.31% reduction over the control (GYP 0% + FYM 0 ton ha−1). As a result, this leads to a decrease in soil electrical conductivity, exchangeable sodium (Ex. Na), and ESP values. The results were confirmed by the LSD test at 0.05. It is fascinating to see how different treatments can have such a significant impact on soil properties. The prediction models indicate that ESP’s sodic soil treatment effect (R2 = 0.95) determines the optimal amendment level for displacing Ex. Na from the exchange site. The best estimator models for ESP using sodic soil treatment levels were ESP = 1.65–0.33 GYP for sole gypsum application and ESP = 1.65–0.33 GYP + 0.28 FYM for combined GYP and FYM application, respectively. Conclusion: The study found that combined GYP and FYM applications reduced ESP to less than 10% in agriculture, but further research is needed to determine their effectiveness at the field level.
Funder
Project of the Interuniversity Cooperation program with Arba Minch University of Ethiopia
Reference128 articles.
1. Soil health and its improvement through novel agronomic and innovative approaches;Shahane;Front. Agron.,2021 2. Organic resource management: Impacts on soil aggregate stability and other soil physico-chemical properties;Karami;Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.,2012 3. Dotaniya, L.M., Meena, M.D., Choudhary, R.L., Meena, M.K., Singh, H., Dotaniya, C.K., Meena, L.K., Doutaniya, R.K., Meena, K.N., and Jat, R.S. (2023). Management of plant nutrient dynamics under alkaline soils through graded application of pressmud and gypsum. PLoS ONE, 18. 4. Abbas, G., Rehman, S., Siddiqui, M.H., Ali, H.M., Farooq, M.A., and Chen, Y. (2022). Potassium and humic acid synergistically increase salt tolerance and nutrient uptake in contrasting wheat genotypes through ionic homeostasis and activation of antioxidant enzymes. Plants, 11. 5. Land suitability assessment for maize farming using a GIS-AHP method for a semi-arid region, Iran;Tashayo;J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci.,2020
|
|