Affiliation:
1. College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
2. School of Economics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
Abstract
Agricultural technology extension and social networks are the essential components of formal and informal institutions, respectively, and their influence on agricultural production has been the focus of academics. This article takes conservation tillage technology as an example, based on simple random unduplicated sampling, and uses survey data of 781 farmers in Heilongjiang, Henan, Shandong, and Shanxi provinces of China. This article empirically tests the interaction effects and heterogeneity of agricultural technology extension and social networks on farmers’ adoption of conservation tillage technology and analyzes their substitution effect or complementary effect. The results showed the following: (1) From a single dimension, both agricultural technology extension and social networks can significantly promote farmers’ adoption of conservation tillage technology, and the promotion effect of agricultural technology extension is greater. The average probability of farmers who accept agricultural technology extension and social networks adopting conservation tillage technology increases by 36.49% and 7.09%, respectively. (2) There is a complementary effect between agricultural technology extension and social networks in promoting farmers’ adoption of conservation tillage technology. The two functions complement and support each other, and this complementary effect is more evident in social networks’ reciprocity. (3) Further analysis reveals that the interaction effect between agricultural technology extension and social networks has significant group differences, technology type differences, and regional differences in farmers’ adoption of conservation tillage technology. Therefore, to facilitate the extension and application of conservation tillage technology, efforts need to be made in both agricultural technology extension and social networks, fully leveraging the complementary effects of the two. In addition, differentiated policies and measures should be adopted according to local conditions, and precise policies should be implemented for different groups and technologies.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
National Social Science Foundation of China
Social Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference76 articles.
1. Conservation tillage: The role of farm and operator characteristics and the perception of soil erosion;Gould;Land Econ.,1989
2. Benites, J.R., and Ashburner, J.E. (2003). Conservation Agriculture: Environment, Farmers Experiences, Innovations, Socio-Economy, Policy, Springer.
3. Blevins, R., Frye, W., and Smith, M. (2018). A Systems Approach to Conservation Tillage, CRC Press.
4. Application status and countermeasure analysis of conservation tillage;Du;J. Chin. Agric. Mech.,2020
5. Regional differences in the soil and water conservation efficiency of conservation tillage in China;Jia;Catena,2019