Abstract
Sensitivity experiments were conducted on Typhoon Mujigae, which occurred in 2015, wherein the Weather Research and Forecasting Advanced Research (WRF-ARW) model was used to select two local and two nonlocal planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes: the quasi-normal scale elimination (QNSE) and Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ) schemes, and the Yonsei University (YSU) and medium-range forecast (MRF) schemes, respectively. The differences in rainfall response in the typhoon’s inner core and outer region were evaluated by comparing the anomaly rainfall distribution, heat transmission, and mixing processes in the boundary layer among the PBL schemes. The results show that the simulated rainfall in typhoon Mujigae has large uncertainty among the PBL schemes and a significant difference between the inner and outer regions. Compared with the observation, the simulated rainfall was significantly higher in the inner core and slightly lower in the outer region. All PBL schemes accurately identified the rainfall location, although the amounts differed between the schemes. The rainfall levels in the MRF scheme were closest to the observation, followed by those in the YSU and MYJ schemes; the QNSE scheme showed the largest deviation. In general, rainfall simulation using a nonlocal boundary layer scheme such as MRF had the best results for both the inner core and the outer region.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Science Research Foundation
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献