Review of Ground-Level Ozone Impact in Respiratory Health Deterioration for the Past Two Decades

Abstract

Background: Ground-level ozone has been gaining notoriety with increasing evidence of its nefarious effects on health, especially respiratory diseases. Where do we stand on the solidity of this data and is there room for improvement? Objectives: Evaluate this evidence for incongruities or heterogeneity in this field of research. How is the exposure assessment conducted, where does Portugal stand in this field, and what can be improved? Health deterioration concerning asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are analysed. Methods: A review of 1735 studies was conducted through PubMed and Google Scholar engines for the past two decades. We identified 59 eligible studies and included an array of variables, including O3 measurements, number of air-quality monitoring stations used, relative risks, odds ratios, hazard ratios, number of hospital admissions, visits, or mortality, and size of population dataset used. Results: Approximately 83% of data in this review presents significant correlations of ozone with asthma, COPD, and ARDS. Studies that report negative or not significant associations mention a lack of data or topographic differences as the main issue with these divergent results. Studies consistently report summer as a period of particular concern. Portuguese data in this field is lacking. Conclusions: This research field is growing in interest and there is evidence that ozone plays a non-negligible role in health deterioration. The few Portuguese studies in this field seem aligned with the literature reviewed but more research is needed. Suggested improvements are more and better data through denser air-quality networks to accurately depict personal exposure to ozone. Homogenization of the exposure assessment concerning averaging times of ozone to daily maximum 8 h averages whenever possible. Risk increments based on 10 ppb instead of interquartile ranges. Lastly, contrary to some studies in this review, the topographic effect on concentrations and health deterioration should not be underestimated and seasonality should always be checked.