Long-Term Analysis of Tropospheric Ozone in the Urban Area of Guadalajara, Mexico: A New Insight of an Alternative Criterion

Abstract

Tropospheric ozone is an obligatorily-regulated pollutant, to ensure health protection and better air quality. Most countries have established maximum permissible limits (MPL) equal to 0.06 or 0.070 ppmv, but these could be insufficient considering the strictest MPL of the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Such concentrations may still cause health damage to some groups of the population in urban areas. Additionally, the mean value is the principal statistical parameter for monitoring air pollution. This factor may be hiding critical ozone concentrations for public health. This work examines the mean and maximum ozone based on a multi-temporal analysis, to explore the use of a maximum average value as an air quality standard. The mean ozone had a remarkably stationary contrast; while, the maximum ozone emphasized a semi-permanent state of high pollution over the year. Diurnal variation highlights the differences of frequency between the mean and maximum ozone above any MPL, which is accentuated when compared with the WHO guidelines. Under the WHO-MPL, the mean ozone underestimates the highest concentrations; while the maximum ozone represents the extremely high concentrations observed over the year. Instead, the maximum average ozone becomes moderate; this preserves the proper, but conservative high concentrations, following similar temporal patterns as the mean ozone. This parameter is proposed to be adapted as an alternative statistical criterion to prevent negative effects on public health due to high and frequent ozone concentrations in subsequent years.