Critical Perspectives of NGOs on Voluntary Corporate Environmental Reporting: Thai Public Listed Companies

Author:

Wichianrak Jittima1,Khan Tehmina2ORCID,Teh David3,Dellaportas Steven4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Hat Yai Campus, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand

2. School of Accounting, Information Systems and Supply Chain, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

3. College of Business and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

4. International Business School Suzhou (IBSS), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215000, China

Abstract

This study examines the nature of environmental disclosures of Thai public listed companies (PLCs) which operate in environmentally sensitive industries and the factors affecting environmental disclosures as well as the need for a critical perspective from Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) on corporate environmental reporting. A semi-structured interview approach was used for 19 interviews to attain critical perspectives of NGOs on environmental reporting. Thematic analysis through the lens of legitimacy theory and stakeholder theory is undertaken to identify themes and patterns that emerged from the study. Findings of this study reveal that the lack of quantity and quality when it comes to corporate environmental reports are serious issues, thus activating civil society’s criticism. Quality issues are dominant for the lack of reliance on voluntary environmental reporting by NGOs. The government’s monitoring and regulatory compliance systems is key, which has been highlighted as another factor. NGOs prefer government information over environmental information reported by companies. There is strong support for third-party verification and assurance to make the reports more reliable and useful. This study adds to the environmental disclosures and reporting literature by providing insights into civil society perspectives on corporate environmental reporting in the context of a developing country—Thailand. It sheds light on how companies can improve their stakeholder management and engagement strategy. It provides recommendations which may be used to inform relevant policy makers in improving Thai disclosure regulation and compliance mechanisms to promote greater monitoring and accountability. It also suggests companies further explore and examine potential technologies to support their reporting.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference133 articles.

1. Economics and Climate Emergency;Gills;Globalizations,2021

2. (2022, November 10). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report Global Warming of 1.5 °C—Summary for Policymakers. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm.

3. Sturmer, J. (2014, November 05). IPCC Report Warns Greenhouse Gas Levels at Highest Point in 800,000 Years, Identifies Fossil Fuels as Cause of Recent Increases. Available online: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-11-02/ipcc-say-greenhouse-levels-highest-point-in-thousands-of-years/5861314.

4. Eslamian, S., and Eslamian, F. (2021). Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience: New Frameworks for Building Resilience to Disasters, Springer International Publishing.

5. Building Sustainability Strategy in Business;Teh;J. Bus. Strategy,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3