Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Economic, Artvin Coruh University, Artvin 08100, Turkey
Abstract
Although many criteria and indicator sets have been developed for sustainable ecotourism management in many countries around the world, such a set of criteria and indicators has not been developed in Türkiye yet. The aim of this study was to develop sustainable ecotourism management criteria and indicators specific to Türkiye’s social, economic, and ecological differences and to investigate the possibilities of using this developed set in the sustainable management of the Camili Biosphere Reserve Area. The set that consisted of 12 criteria and 68 indicators prepared based on WTO and UNWTO criteria and indicator sets was used as a starting point. Within the scope of the Delphi method, as a result of three stages of repeated questionnaires, a set of criteria and indicators consisting of 11 criteria and 101 indicators was reached, based on the suggestions and consensus of four expert groups. In the next step, the adaptation and prioritization of the national sustainable ecotourism management criteria and indicator set for the Camili Biosphere Reserve Area were realized using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method, depending on the opinions of four local expert groups. As a result, it was concluded that the ecotourism activities carried out in the Camili Biosphere Reserve received a total score of 95.4 and that the ecotourism activities in the area were positively sustainable, with an average of 69.1%. It was determined that ecotourism activities in the Camili Biosphere Reserve are positively sustainable in terms of “level of awareness and perception of the field”, “socio-economic benefits to the local people”, “local participation”, “financial structure”, “environmental education and practices“, and “visitor satisfaction” criteria. However, in order to ensure the sustainability of ecotourism activities both at the country level and at the local level, studies should be carried out with a participatory approach by establishing a balance between the expectations of the local people and the income obtained from ecotourism, by providing a central authority, and by making improvements in the financing structure.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference80 articles.
1. Environmental problems and philosophy in the context of human-nature relationship;Pamukkale Univ. J. Soc. Sci. Inst.,2013
2. Şener, F.N. (2009). Nongovernmental and Administrative Structuring in Certification and Accreditation of Sustainable Forestry Management Applications in Turkey (Case Studies for Andirin and Göksun State Forestry Enterprises 2003–2007). [Master’s Thesis, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University].
3. Cinnioğlu, H. (2015). A Research with a Critical Perspective on Impacts of Ecotourism on Environment within the Scope of Sustainable Economic Development, Namık Kemal University Institute of Social Sciences. Nu: 3.
4. Andries, D.M., Arnaiz-Schmitz, C., Diaz-Rodriquez, P., Herrero-Jauregui, C., and Schmitz, M.F. (2021). Sustainable tourism and natural protected areas: Exploring local population perceptions in a post-conflict scenario. Land, 10.
5. Ecotourism governance and protected areas sustainability in Cameroon: The case of Campo Ma’an National Park;Forje;Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain.,2022
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献