Aggregated Rankings of Top Leagues’ Football Teams: Application and Comparison of Different Ranking Methods

Author:

Gyarmati László1,Orbán-Mihálykó Éva1ORCID,Mihálykó Csaba1,Vathy-Fogarassy Ágnes2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mathematics, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10, 8200 Veszprém, Hungary

2. Department of Computer Science and Systems Technology, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10, 8200 Veszprém, Hungary

Abstract

In this study, the effectiveness and characteristics of three ranking methods were investigated based on their performance in ranking European football teams. The investigated methods were the Thurstone method with ties, the analytic hierarchy process with logarithmic least squares method, and the RankNet neural network. The methods were analyzed in both complete and incomplete comparison tasks. The ranking based on complete comparison was performed on match results of national leagues, where each team had match results against all the other teams. In the incomplete comparison case, in addition to the national league results, only a few match results from international cups were available to determine the aggregated ranking of the teams playing in the top five European leagues. The rankings produced by the ranking methods were compared with each other, with the official national rankings, and with the UEFA club coefficient rankings. In addition, the correlation between the aggregated rankings and the Transfermarkt financial ranking was also examined for the sake of interest.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference56 articles.

1. Paired comparisons analysis: An axiomatic approach to ranking methods;Hendrickx;Soc. Choice Welf.,2014

2. Aggregation of preferences by the generalized row sum method;Chebotarev;Math. Soc. Sci.,1994

3. Elo, A.E. (1978). The Rating of Chessplayers, Past and Present, BT Batsford Limited.

4. Giontella, A., Sarti, F.M., Biggio, G.P., Giovannini, S., Cherchi, R., Silvestrelli, M., and Pieramati, C. (2020). Elo method and race traits: A new integrated system for sport horse genetic evaluation. Animals, 10.

5. FIFA (2022, November 09). Revision of the FIFA / Coca Cola World Ranking. Available online: https://img.fifa.com/image/upload/edbm045h0udbwkqew35a.pdf.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3