Discrete versus Continuous Algorithms in Dynamics of Affective Decision Making

Author:

Yukalov Vyacheslav I.12ORCID,Yukalova Elizaveta P.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Bogolubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna 141980, Russia

2. Instituto de Fisica de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, CP 369, São Carlos 13560-970, Brazil

3. Laboratory of Information Technologies, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna 141980, Russia

Abstract

The dynamics of affective decision making is considered for an intelligent network composed of agents with different types of memory: long-term and short-term memory. The consideration is based on probabilistic affective decision theory, which takes into account the rational utility of alternatives as well as the emotional alternative attractiveness. The objective of this paper is the comparison of two multistep operational algorithms of the intelligent network: one based on discrete dynamics and the other on continuous dynamics. By means of numerical analysis, it is shown that, depending on the network parameters, the characteristic probabilities for continuous and discrete operations can exhibit either close or drastically different behavior. Thus, depending on which algorithm is employed, either discrete or continuous, theoretical predictions can be rather different, which does not allow for a uniquely defined description of practical problems. This finding is important for understanding which of the algorithms is more appropriate for the correct analysis of decision-making tasks. A discussion is given, revealing that the discrete operation seems to be more realistic for describing intelligent networks as well as affective artificial intelligence.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Computational Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Numerical Analysis,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference87 articles.

1. Turkle, S. (1984). The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, Granada.

2. Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems;Brehmer;Psychologica,1992

3. Beresford, B., and Sloper, T. (2008). Understanding the Dynamics of Decision-Making and Choice: A Scoping Study of Key Psychological Theories to Inform the Design and Analysis of the Panel Study, University of York.

4. Evertsz, R., Thangarajah, J., and Ly, T. (2019). Practical Modelling of Dynamic Decision Making, Springer.

5. Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: A review;Perc;J. R. Soc. Interface,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3