Digital Developmental Advising Systems for Engineering Students Based on Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology Student Outcome Evaluations

Author:

Hussain Wajid1ORCID,Fong Mak2,Spady William G.1

Affiliation:

1. IN4OBE LLC, St. Petersburg, FL 33702, USA

2. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Gannon University, Erie, PA 16541, USA

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the benefits and limitations of the implementation of novel digital academic advising systems based on the principles of authentic outcome-based education (OBE) using automated collection and reporting processes for Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) student outcomes data for effective developmental advising. We examine digital developmental advising models of undergraduate engineering programs in two universities that employ customized features of the web-based software EvalTools® 6.0, including an advising module based on assessment methodology incorporating the faculty course assessment report, performance indicators, and hybrid rubrics classified according to the affective, cognitive, and psychomotor domains of Bloom’s learning model. A case study approach over a six-year period is adopted for this research. The two case studies present results of samples of developmental advising activity employing sequential explanatory mixed methods models using a combination of quantitative and qualitative analyses of (a) detailed students’ outcomes and performance indicator information and (b) self-evaluation of their professional development and lifelong learning skills. The findings of this study show that digital advising systems employing the faculty course assessment report using performance indicators and hybrid rubrics can provide comprehensive and realistic outcome data to help both developmental advisors and students easily identify the specific cause of performance failures, implement practical recommendations for remedial actions, and track improvements. Inherent strong skills can also be identified in academically weak students by observing patterns or trends of relatively better-performing outcomes to reinforce their natural affinity for learning specialized competencies to help them pursue related and successful career paths.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference65 articles.

1. Killen, R. (2007). Teaching Strategies for Outcome Based Education, Juta, & Co.. [2nd ed.].

2. Moon, J. (2022, March 19). Linking Levels, Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria. Bologna Process. European Higher Education Area. Available online: http://aic.lv/ace/ace_disk/Bologna/Bol_semin/Edinburgh/J_Moon_backgrP.pdf.

3. Choosing outcomes of significance;Spady;Educ. Leadersh.,1994

4. Spady, W. (1994). Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers, American Association of School Administrators.

5. Spady, W., Hussain, W., Largo, J., and Uy, F. (2018). Beyond Outcomes Accreditation, Rex Publishers. Available online: https://www.rexestore.com/home/1880-beyond-outcomes-accredidationpaper-bound.html.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3