Primary Proximal ACL Repair: A Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Arthroscopic Suture Configurations

Author:

Rosslenbroich Steffen B.1ORCID,Achtnich Andrea2,Brodkorb Cathrin1,Kösters Clemens3,Kreis Carolin1,Metzlaff Sebastian4,Schliemann Benedikt5,Petersen Wolf6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Westfalian Wilhelm’s University, Waldeyerstrasse 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany

2. Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TU Technische Universität Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany

3. Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Maria and Joseph Hospital Greven, 48268 Greven, Germany

4. Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, St. Joseph Hospital, 12101 Berlin, Germany

5. Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Herz-Jesu Hospital, 48165 Münster, Germany

6. Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Martin Luther Hospital, 14193 Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Purpose: Several suture techniques have been described in the past for direct ACL repair with poor healing capacity and a high re-rupture rate. Therefore, we investigated a refixation technique for acute primary proximal ACL repair. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of different suture configurations using a knotless anchor. Methods: In this study, 35 fresh-frozen porcine knees underwent proximal ACL refixation. First, in 10 porcine femora, the biomechanical properties of the knotless anchor, without the ligament attached, were tested. Then, three different suture configurations were evaluated to reattach the remaining ACL. Using a material testing machine, the structural properties were evaluated for cyclic loading followed by loading to failure. Results: The ultimate failure load of the knotless anchor was 198, 76 N ± 23, 4 N significantly higher than all of the tested ACL suture configurations. Comparing the different configurations, the modified Kessler–Bunnell suture showed significant superior ultimate failure load, with 81, 2 N ± 15, 6 N compared to the twofold and single sutures (50, 5 N ± 14 N and 37, 5 ± 3, 8 N). In cyclic loading, there was no significant difference noted for the different configurations in terms of stiffness and elongation. Conclusions: The results of this in vitro study show that when performing ACL suture using a knotless anchor, a modified Kessler–Bunnell suture provides superior biomechanical properties than a single and a twofold suture. Within this construct, no failure at the bone–anchor interface was seen. Clinical relevance: Since primary suture repair techniques of ACL tears have been abandoned because of inconsistent results, ACL reconstruction remains the gold standard of treating ACL tears. However, with the latest improvements in surgical techniques, instrumentation, hardware and imaging, primary ACL suture repair might be a treatment option for a select group of patients. By establishing an arthroscopic technique in which proximal ACL avulsion can be reattached, the original ACL can be preserved by using a knotless anchor and a threefold suture configuration. Nevertheless, this technique provides an inferior ultimate failure load compared to graft techniques, so a careful rehabilitation program must be followed if using this technique in vivo.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference47 articles.

1. Anterior cruciate ligament injury: Diagnosis, management, and prevention;Cimino;Am. Fam. Physician,2010

2. Cost analysis of converting from single-bundle to double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction;Brophy;Am. J. Sport. Med.,2009

3. History of surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament;Eberhardt;Der Orthop.,2002

4. VI. Ruptured Crucial Ligaments and their Repair by Operation;Robson;Ann. Surg.,1903

5. Cyclic loading comparison between biodegradable interference screw fixation and biodegradable double cross-pin fixation of human bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts;Zantop;Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. Off. Publ. Arthrosc. Assoc. N. Am. Int. Arthrosc. Assoc.,2005

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3