Evaluation of Qualitative Colour Palettes for Tactile Maps

Author:

Wabiński Jakub1ORCID,Śmiechowska-Petrovskij Emilia2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Geospatial Engineering and Geodesy, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland

2. Department of Special Education, Faculty of Education, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

Much attention is currently being paid to developing universally designed solutions. Tactile maps, designed for people with visual impairments (PVI), require both graphic and tactile content. While many more- or less-official guidelines regarding tactile symbols exist, the subject literature lacks clear guidance on creating legible, highly contrasting graphic symbols for visual perception by those with residual vision. This study specifically addresses the application of colour, a key graphic variable that Is most often used to differentiate area symbols. We wanted to verify whether it is possible to choose a universal qualitative colour palette for tactile maps. We have proposed four different palettes, each with eight colours, that were later evaluated in a controlled study by 16 PVI with varying sociodemographic characteristics, using the VIEW model. The model is widely applied in the area of marketing research and considers the following aspects: Visibility, Informational, Emotional Appeal, and Workability. Our results indicate a lack of unanimity in choosing the best qualitative palette. The results of three palettes are comparable, with a subtle preference for the palette optimized for colour differences using the Python algorithm. Notably, the palette commonly used in official tactile maps in Poland received the lowest scores in every analysed dimension.

Funder

National Centre for Research and Development

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference34 articles.

1. Visual Organization and Thematic Map Communication;Dent;Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr.,1972

2. Robinson, A.H., Morrison, J.L., Muehrcke, P.C., Kimerling, J.A., and Guptill, S.C. (1995). Elements of Cartography, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [6th ed].

3. Krygier, J., and Wood, D. (2016). Making Maps: A Visual Guide to Map Design for GIS, Guilford Press. [3rd ed.].

4. The Effects of Age, Refractive Status, and Luminance on Pupil Size;Guillon;Optom. Vis. Sci.,2016

5. Jenny, B., and Kelso, N.V. (2007). Color Design for the Color Vision Impaired. Cartogr. Perspect., 61–67.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3