Comparison of Condition Rating Systems for Bridges in Three European Countries

Author:

Matos José C.1ORCID,Nicoletti Vanni2ORCID,Kralovanec Jakub3ORCID,Sousa Hélder S.1ORCID,Gara Fabrizio2ORCID,Moravcik Martin3ORCID,Morais Maria J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, ISISE, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

2. Department of Civil and Building Engineering, and Architecture, DICEA, Univeristà Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy

3. Department of Structures and Bridges, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia

Abstract

Europe faces many problems connected to ageing infrastructure which was built in the second half of the 20th century. Bridges are one of the crucial elements of these infrastructures. In recent years, European countries have witnessed many failures of bridges across the continent. For example, the collapse of Viadotto Polcevera in Genoa caught the attention of society regarding its tragic consequences. Therefore, engineers must deal with the assessment of existing bridges which is essential for proper decision-making. Condition rating systems for bridges vary from country to country. Consequently, these differences in the methodology can lead to different conclusions related to the future service of assessed structures. For these reasons, this paper briefly describes condition rating systems for road bridges in Italy, Slovakia, and Portugal and defines the differences in the methodology. Subsequently, the obtained conclusions are compared and discussed. The aim of the paper is to encourage standardization in the assessment of bridge health conditions within European countries, highlighting the differences in the current systems adopted by various countries.

Funder

Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology

FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R&D Unit Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering

Associate Laboratory Advanced Production and Intelligent Systems ARISE

Scientific Grant Agency

Cultural and Educational Grant Agency

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference25 articles.

1. Innocenzi, R.D., Nicoletti, V., Arezzo, D., Carbonari, S., Gara, F., and Dezi, L. (2022). A Good Practice for the Proof Testing of Cable-Stayed Bridges. Appl. Sci., 12.

2. Nicoletti, V., Martini, R., Carbonari, S., and Gara, F. (2023). Operational Modal Analysis as a Support for the Development of Digital Twin Models of Bridges. Infrastructures, 8.

3. Chodhury, J., and Hasnat, A. (2015, January 21–22). Bridge collapses around the world: Causes and mechanisms. Proceedings of the IABSE-JSCE Joint Conference on Advance in Bridge Engineering, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

4. ASCE (2021). ASCE Report Card from America’s Infrastructure 2021—A Comprehensive Assessment of America’s Infrastructure Executive Summary, ASCE.

5. (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-3:2005).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3