Evaluating the Ileal and Cecal Microbiota Composition of a 1940 Heritage Genetic Line and a 2016 Commercial Line of white Leghorns Fed Representative Diets from 1940 to 2016
-
Published:2023-11-13
Issue:22
Volume:13
Page:12259
-
ISSN:2076-3417
-
Container-title:Applied Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Applied Sciences
Author:
Wall Dannica C.1ORCID, Dittoe Dana2, Malherios Ramon D.1ORCID, Anderson Kenneth E.1, Anthony Nick2
Affiliation:
1. Prestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 2. Center for Food Safety, Division of Agriculture, Research and Extension, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA
Abstract
This study identified and evaluated differences between microbiome compositions of the ileum and ceca of 1940 and 2016 white leghorn genetic strains fed representative contemporary diets from those times. Ileal and cecal samples were collected at 69 weeks of age. Alpha and beta diversity metrics were generated, and the Analysis of Composition of Microbiomes (ANCOM) was utilized to determine significantly different taxa. Ileum and ceca alpha diversity were significantly different (p = 0.001; Q = 0.001); however, no differences between genetic lineage were observed (p > 0.05; Q > 0.05). Beta diversity between the ileum and ceca and the genetic lines was significantly different (p = 0.001; Q = 0.001). The ANCOM of the ileum showed significant differences between Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota phyla (p ˂ 0.05) and significant differences between Pseudomonas, Rhizobiaceae, Leuconostoc, and Aeriscardovia genera (p ˂ 0.05). For ceca ANCOM, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteriota, and Euryarchaeota phyla were significantly different (p ˂ 0.05), with Firmicutes having the highest relative abundance across all groups, and there were significant differences in genera Pseudomonas, Leuconostoc, Alloprevotella, and Aeri scardovia, with Alloprevotella having the highest relative abundance. The results suggest that genetic makeup in conjunction with the nutritional composition influences the cecal and ileal microbiota of corresponding hens.
Funder
North Carolina Layer Performance and Management Test
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference47 articles.
1. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet;Pan;Gut Microbes,2013 2. Chicken Gut Microbiota: Importance and Detection Technology;Shang;Front. Vet. Sci.,2018 3. Xiao, S.-S., Mi, J.-D., Mei, L., Liang, J., Feng, K.-X., Wu, Y.-B., Liao, X.-D., and Wang, Y. (2021). Microbial Diversity and Community Variation in the Intestines of Layer Chickens. Animals, 11. 4. Glendinning, L., Watson, K.A., and Watson, M. (2019). Development of the duodenal, ileal, jejunal and caecal microbiota in chickens. Anim. Microbiome, 1. 5. Hubert, S.M., Al-Ajeeli, M., Bailey, C.A., and Athrey, G. (2019). The Role of Housing Environment and Dietary Protein Source on the Gut Microbiota of Chicken. Animals, 9.
|
|