Processing Speed and Attentional Shift/Mental Flexibility in Patients with Stroke: A Comprehensive Review on the Trail Making Test in Stroke Studies

Author:

Tsiakiri Anna1ORCID,Christidi Foteini1,Tsiptsios Dimitrios1ORCID,Vlotinou Pinelopi1,Kitmeridou Sofia1,Bebeletsi Paschalina1,Kokkotis Christos2,Serdari Aspasia3,Tsamakis Konstantinos4ORCID,Aggelousis Nikolaos2ORCID,Vadikolias Konstantinos1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Neurology Department, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece

2. Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Democritus University of Thrace, 691 00 Komotini, Greece

3. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 681 00 Alexandroupolis, Greece

4. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, London SE5 8AB, UK

Abstract

The Trail Making Test (TMT) is one of the most commonly administered tests in clinical and research neuropsychological settings. The two parts of the test (part A (TMT-A) and part B (TMT-B)) enable the evaluation of visuoperceptual tracking and processing speed (TMT-A), as well as divided attention, set-shifting and cognitive flexibility (TMT-B). The main cognitive processes that are assessed using TMT, i.e., processing speed, divided attention, and cognitive flexibility, are often affected in patients with stroke. Considering the wide use of TMT in research and clinical settings since its introduction in neuropsychological practice, the purpose of our review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of TMT in stroke patients. We present the most representative studies assessing processing speed and attentional shift/mental flexibility in stroke settings using TMT and applying scoring methods relying on conventional TMT scores (e.g., time-to-complete part A and part B), as well as derived measures (e.g., TMT-(B-A) difference score, TMT-(B/A) ratio score, errors in part A and part B). We summarize the cognitive processes commonly associated with TMT performance in stroke patients (e.g., executive functions), lesion characteristics and neuroanatomical underpinning of TMT performance post-stroke, the association between TMT performance and patients’ instrumental activities of daily living, motor difficulties, speech difficulties, and mood statue, as well as their driving ability. We also highlight how TMT can serve as an objective marker of post-stroke cognitive recovery following the implementation of interventions. Our comprehensive review underscores that the TMT stands as an invaluable asset in the stroke assessment toolkit, contributing nuanced insights into diverse cognitive, functional, and emotional dimensions. As research progresses, continued exploration of the TMT potential across these domains is encouraged, fostering a deeper comprehension of post-stroke dynamics and enhancing patient-centered care across hospitals, rehabilitation centers, research institutions, and community health settings. Its integration into both research and clinical practice reaffirms TMT status as an indispensable instrument in stroke-related evaluations, enabling holistic insights that extend beyond traditional neurological assessments.

Funder

Study of the interrelationships between neuroimaging, neurophysiological and biomechanical biomarkers in stroke rehabilitation

Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Greece and the European Union

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference131 articles.

1. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary;Carone;Appl. Neuropsychol.,2007

2. Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., Tranel, D., Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., and Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological Assessment, Oxford University Press.

3. Trail Making Test, Part B as a Measure of Executive Control: Validation Using a Set-Switching Paradigm;Arbuthnott;J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol.,2000

4. Lamberty, G.J., and Axelrod, B.N. (2006). The Quantified Process Approach to Neuropsychological Assessment, Taylor & Francis. Studies on Neuropsychology, Neurology and Cognition.

5. Derived Trail Making Test indices: A preliminary report;Lamberty;Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol. Behav. Neurol.,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3