Quantification of Antiphospholipid Antibodies: The Importance of Using an Appropriate Methodology for Each Clinical Profile

Author:

Cabrera-Marante Oscar12,Garcinuño Sara2,Pleguezuelo Daniel Enrique12ORCID,Gil-Etayo Francisco J.13ORCID,Tenica Iulian4,Rodríguez de Frías Edgard12ORCID,Zafra Denis5,Castro Nerea5,Paz-Artal Estela12,Serrano Antonio126ORCID,Serrano Manuel12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Immunology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain

2. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain

3. Department of Haematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain

4. Department of Occupational Medicine, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain

5. Department of Haematology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain

6. Biomedical Research Centre Network for Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) is associated with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), characterized by thrombosis and obstetric morbidity. aPLs included in APS classification criteria are lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin and anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-I of IgG or IgM isotypes. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is the most used diagnostic technique to determine aPLs. Recently, new automated technologies mainly based in antigen-coated beads have been developed. The aim is to compare a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (M1) and an antigen-coated bead assay (M2) in obstetric and thrombotic APS patients. All samples from the first 1020 patients received in the Immune Service Laboratory (Hospital 12 de Octubre) during the recruitment period, without exclusions, were analysed for aPLs. The weighted kappa for both methods in all the patients was 0.39 (0.30–0.47). Agreement increased to 0.56 (0.38–0.73) in patients with autoimmune disease. Sensitivity and specificity obtained for M1 were 17.1% and 89.3%, respectively, and 12.7% and 91.4% for M2. The sensibility and specificity of IgG isotypes were higher than the IgM ones. Regarding obstetric patients, M1 obtained significant diagnostic performance and had more sensitivity 23.75 (14.95–34.58) compared to M2 12.50 (6.16–21.79). In conclusion, clinical suspicion-based method selection for aPLs should be considered. To identify obstetric APS patients, solid phase methods remain more preferable.

Funder

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Inorganic Chemistry,Organic Chemistry,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Computer Science Applications,Spectroscopy,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Catalysis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3