Affiliation:
1. Center for Energy and Environmental Sustainability, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA
2. Center for Energy and Environmental Sustainability, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA
Abstract
To implement sustainable water resource management, the industries that produce a huge amount of wastewater are aiming to recycle wastewater. Reverse osmosis (RO) is an advanced membrane process that can produce potable water from wastewater. However, the presence of diverse pollutants in the wastewater necessitates effective pretreatment to ensure successful RO implementation. This study evaluated the efficiency of microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) as two pretreatment methods prior to RO, i.e., MF-RO and UF-RO, for recycling poultry slaughterhouse wastewater (PSWW). The direct treatment of PSWW with RO (direct RO) was also considered for comparison. In this study, membrane technology serves as a post treatment for PSWW, which was conventionally treated at Sanderson Farm. The results demonstrated that all of the processes, including MF-RO, UF-RO, and direct RO treatment of PSWW, rejected 100% of total phosphorus (TP), over 91.2% of chemical oxygen demand (COD), and 87% of total solids (TSs). Total nitrogen (TN) levels were reduced to 5 mg/L for MF-RO, 4 mg/L for UF-RO, and 9 mg/L for direct RO. In addition, the pretreatment of PSWW with MF and UF increased RO flux from 46.8 L/m2 h to 51 L/m2 h, an increase of approximately 9%. The product water obtained after MF-RO, UF-RO, and direct RO meets the required potable water quality standards for recycling PSWW in the poultry industry. A cost analysis demonstrated that MF-RO was the most economical option among membrane processes, primarily due to MF operating at a lower pressure and having a high water recovery ratio. In contrast, the cost of using RO without MF and UF pretreatments was approximately 2.6 times higher because of cleaning and maintenance expenses related to fouling. This study concluded that MF-RO is a preferable option for recycling PSWW. This pretreatment method would significantly contribute to environmental sustainability by reusing well-treated PSWW for industrial poultry purposes while maintaining cost efficiency.
Funder
USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture
National Science Foundation CREST Center
Reference48 articles.
1. Membrane Technology for Sustainable Water Resources Management: Challenges and Future Projections;Issaoui;Sustain. Chem. Pharm.,2022
2. Treatment of Cauliflower Processing Wastewater by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis in View of Recycling;Garnier;J. Food Eng.,2022
3. Advanced Technologies for Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment: A Systematic Review;Baker;J. Dispers. Sci. Technol.,2020
4. (2023, September 25). Optimizing Water Reuse in Meat and Poultry Processing. Available online: https://www.watertechonline.com/water-reuse/article/14223701/optimizing-water-reuse-in-meat-and-poultry-processing.
5. Maggie, N., Bingoa, M.B., and Ntwampea, S.K.O. (2019, January 18–19). Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment Plant Design Advancements. Proceedings of the 16th SOUTH AFRICA Int’l Conference on Agricultural, Chemical, Biological & Environmental Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献