Optimization of the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Pomace from Querétaro, Mexico, Using MSPD
-
Published:2023-12-28
Issue:1
Volume:11
Page:13
-
ISSN:2297-8739
-
Container-title:Separations
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Separations
Author:
Daniela Tellez-Robles1, del Socorro López-Cortez Ma.1, Fortunata Santoyo-Tepole1, Patricia Rosales-Martínez1, Felipe García-Ochoa1, Teresa Hernández-Botello Mayuric1, de la Paz Salgdo-Cruz María1
Affiliation:
1. Laboratorio de Investigación II, Departamento de Biofísica, Central de Instrumentación y Espectroscopía de Posgrado, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Colonia Casco de Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, Mexico
Abstract
Red wine contains polyphenols which are extracted during the winemaking process. However, winemaking is not an extraction; therefore, the resulting byproducts still have a substantial polyphenol content. The aim of this study was to compare two methods for the extraction of phenolic compounds: maceration and matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD). Grape pomace (Vitis vinifera var. Cabernet Sauvignon) from a winery in Querétaro, Mexico was used. The optimal conditions for both methods were identified. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity were the response variables. A central composite design was used (Minitab 17) for the extraction by maceration. The maceration time (1, 4, 12, 20, and 24 h) and the ratio of ethanol (50 to 80%) acidified with 1% HCl were the two factors studied. For the MSPD extraction, sea sand was used as a dispersant, and a 22 factorial design was employed for the evaluation, with the elution volume and the ratio of sample/dispersant being the two factors analyzed. The optimal extraction method was MSPD with 96 mL (acidified ethanol) as the elution volume and a 1:2 ratio of sample/dispersant. Using these conditions, 14.01 ± 0.19 mMol TEAC/100 g db (Trolox equivalent of antioxidant capacity) of grape pomace was obtained, whereas the total phenolic content was 2836.73 ± 41.90 mg GAE/100 g db. These values are greater than those obtained by maceration. These conditions are close to those predicted by the model (analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a level of significance of 5% (p < 0.05) and a Tukey comparison test for determining significant differences in the comparison of results).
Funder
Secretary of Research and Postgraduate of Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Subject
Filtration and Separation,Analytical Chemistry
Reference56 articles.
1. Bala, S., Garg, D., Sridhar, K., Inbaraj, B.S., Singh, R., Kamma, S., and Sharma, M. (2023). Transformation of agro-waste into value-added bioproducts and bioactive compounds: Micro/nano formulations and application in the agri-food-pharma sector. Bioengineering, 10. 2. Baroi, A.M., Popitiu, M., Fierascu, I., Sărdărescu, I.D., and Fierascu, R.C. (2022). Grapevine wastes: A rich source of antioxidants and other biologically active compounds. Antioxidants, 11. 3. Potential for use of the residues of the wine industry in human nutrition and as agricultural input;Botelho;Grapes Wines-Adv. Prod. Process. Anal. Valorization,2018 4. Antioxidant potential overviews of secondary metabolites (polyphenols) in fruits;Swallah;Int. J. Food Sci.,2020 5. García-Pérez, P., and Gallego, P.P. (2022). Lipid Oxidation in Food and Biological Systems, Springer.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|