Abstract
Given strict emission targets and legal requirements, especially in the automotive industry, environmentally friendly and simultaneously versatile applicable production technologies are gaining importance. In this regard, the use of mechanical joining processes, such as clinching, enable assembly sheet metals to achieve strength properties similar to those of established thermal joining technologies. However, to guarantee a high reliability of the generated joint connection, the selection of a best-fitting joining technology as well as the meaningful description of individual joint properties is essential. In the context of clinching, few contributions have to date investigated the metamodel-based estimation and optimization of joint characteristics, such as neck or interlock thickness, by applying machine learning and genetic algorithms. Therefore, several regression models have been trained on varying databases and amounts of input parameters. However, if product engineers can only provide limited data for a new joining task, such as incomplete information on applied joining tool dimensions, previously trained metamodels often reach their limits. This often results in a significant loss of prediction quality and leads to increasing uncertainties and inaccuracies within the metamodel-based design of a clinch joint connection. Motivated by this, the presented contribution investigates different machine learning algorithms regarding their ability to achieve a satisfying estimation accuracy on limited input data applying a statistically based feature selection method. Through this, it is possible to identify which regression models are suitable to predict clinch joint characteristics considering only a minimum set of required input features. Thus, in addition to the opportunity to decrease the training effort as well as the model complexity, the subsequent formulation of design equations can pave the way to a more versatile application and reuse of pretrained metamodels on varying tool configurations for a given clinch joining task.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Reference29 articles.
1. Kaščák, L., Spišák, E., and Majerníková, J. (2019, January 23–25). Clinching and Clinch-Riveting as a Green Alternative to Resistance Spot Welding. Proceedings of the 2019 International Council on Technologies of Environmental Protection (ICTEP), Stary Smokovec, Slovakia.
2. Experimental investigation of the flat clinch–rivet process;Shi;Thin-Walled Struct.,2022
3. Investigation of the clinching process with rectangle punch;Ran;Thin-Walled Struct.,2021
4. Recent development of clinching tools and machines;Zhang;Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.,2022
5. (2017). Mechanisches Fügen—Konstruktion und Auslegung—Grundlagen/Überblick (Standard No. DVS-EFB 3470:2017-02).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Influence of process variations on clinch joint characteristics considering the effect of the nominal tool design;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering;2024-06-11