Which Is an Appropriate Quadratic Rheological Model of Fresh Paste, the Modified Bingham Model or the Parabolic Model?

Abstract

The physical meaning and calculating process of the rheological parameters of two nonlinear rheological models, the parabolic model and the modified Bingham model, were compared. The fluidity test and a rheological experiment on cementitious materials were performed. The Couette inverse problem is a key issue in measuring and solving the rheological parameters of fresh cementitious materials. The solution of the Couette inverse problem based on the modified Bingham model is discontinuous when the coefficient of the quadratic term is equal to zero, resulting in a large deviation between the fitting curve and the rheological experimental data. The credibility of the rheological parameters of the pastes calculated based on the modified Bingham model is low. The formulas for calculating yield stress, fiducial differential viscosity and the degree of shear thickening or shear thinning of the parabolic model have been developed. The credibility of the rheological parameters of the pastes calculated based on the parabolic model is high. The flow performance of the paste can be clearly characterized by the rheological parameters calculated with the parabolic model.