Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
2. Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
Abstract
This study compared the efficacy of the actuator line and actuator surface models in carrying out large-eddy simulations of a utility-scale wind turbine. A large-eddy simulation with the actuator surface and line models was employed to study the wake flow and power production of the turbine. While both the actuator models were employed for the blade representation, the nacelle was modeled using the actuator surface approach. Both of the actuator models demonstrated agreement in the mean velocity field, power production, and turbulence kinetic energy of the wake flow. Comparing the wake flow, power production, and turbulence kinetic energy results, it was found that the mean discrepancy between the two models was 0.6%, 0.3%, and 2.3%, respectively. Despite the minor discrepancies, both actuator models accurately captured the hub vortex in the wake of the nacelle, evidenced by an energy peak in wind speed spectra at f/fω≈0.34.
Funder
National Offshore Wind Research and Development Consortium
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Water Power Technologies Office
Reference66 articles.
1. The spacing of wind turbines in large arrays;Newman;Energy Convers.,1977
2. Energy Effectiveness of Arbitrary Arrays of Wind Turbines;Lissaman;J. Energy,1979
3. Jensen, N. (1983). A Note on Wind Generator Interaction, Risø National Laboratory.
4. Katić, I., Højstrup, J., and Jensen, N. (1986, January 7–9). A simple model for cluster efficiency. Proceedings of the EWEC’86, Rome, Italy.
5. On the wind speed reduction in the center of large clusters of wind turbines;Frandsen;J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.,1992
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献