Selecting Appropriate Energy Source Options for an Arctic Research Ship

Author:

Palmén Mikael1,Lotrič Ajda1ORCID,Laakso Aleksi1,Bolbot Victor12ORCID,Elg Mia13ORCID,Valdez Banda Osiris A.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering (Marine Technology), Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland

2. Kotka Maritime Research Centre, 48100 Kotka, Finland

3. Deltamarin Ltd., 00210 Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

Interest in more sustainable energy sources has increased rapidly in the maritime industry, and ambitious goals have been set for decreasing ship emissions. All industry stakeholders have reacted to this with different approaches including the optimisation of ship power plants, the development of new energy-improving sub-systems for existing solutions, or the design of entirely novel power plant concepts employing alternative fuels. This paper assesses the feasibility of different ship energy sources for an icebreaking Arctic research ship. To that end, possible energy sources are assessed based on fuel, infrastructure availability and operational endurance criteria in the operational area of interest. Promising alternatives are analysed further using the evidence-based Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) method. Then, a more thorough investigation with respect to the required fuel tank space, life cycle cost, and CO2 emissions is implemented. The results demonstrate that marine diesel oil (MDO) is currently still the most convenient solution due to the space, operational range, and endurance limitations, although it is possible to use liquefied natural gas (LNG) and methanol if the ship’s arrangement is radically redesigned, which will also lead to reduced emissions and life cycle costs. The use of liquefied hydrogen as the only energy solution for the considered vessel was excluded from the potential options due to low volumetric energy density, and high life cycle and capital costs. Even if it is used with MDO for the investigated ship, the reduction in CO2 emissions will not be as significant as for LNG and methanol, at a much higher capital and lifecycle cost. The advantage of the proposed approach is that unrealistic alternatives are eliminated in a systematic manner before proceeding to detailed techno-economic analysis, facilitating the decision-making and investigation of various options in a more holistic manner.

Funder

Research Council of Finland

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference135 articles.

1. NASA (2023, May 09). Global Warming vs. Climate Change|Facts—Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet, Available online: https://climate.nasa.gov/global-warming-vs-climate-change/.

2. IMO (2020). Fourth IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2020, IMO.

3. (2023, June 21). IMO Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Available online: https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/ghg-emissions.aspx.

4. IMO (2023, June 21). Energy Efficiency Measures. Available online: https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/environment/pages/technical-and-operational-measures.aspx.

5. IMO (2023, June 21). Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)—Regulation 13. Available online: https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Nitrogen-oxides-(NOx)-%E2%80%93-Regulation-13.aspx.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3