Abstract
The present paper deals with the applicability of the Meyer–Peter and Müller (MPM) bed load transport formula. The performance of the formula is examined on data collected in a particular location of Nestos River in Thrace, Greece, in comparison to a proposed Εnhanced MPM (EMPM) formula and to two typical machine learning methods, namely Random Forests (RF) and Gaussian Processes Regression (GPR). The EMPM contains new adjustment parameters allowing calibration. The EMPM clearly outperforms MPM and, also, it turns out to be quite competitive in comparison to the machine learning schemes. Calibrations are repeated with suitably smoothed measurement data and, in this case, EMPM outperforms MPM, RF and GPR. Data smoothing for the present problem is discussed in view of a special nearest neighbor smoothing process, which is introduced in combination with nonlinear regression.
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry
Reference39 articles.
1. Neuere Versuchsresultate über den Geschiebetrieb;Meyer-Peter;Schweiz. Bauztg.,1934
2. Eine Formel zur Berechnung des Geschiebetriebs;Meyer-Peter;Schweiz. Bauztg.,1949
3. Eugen Meyer-Peter and the MPM Sediment Transport Formula
4. Reanalysis and Correction of Bed-Load Relation of Meyer-Peter and Müller Using Their Own Database
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献