Abstract
“Cross-protection”, a nearly 100 years-old virological term, is suggested to be changed to “close protection”. Evidence for the need of such change has accumulated over the past six decades from the laboratory experiments and field tests conducted by plant pathologists and plant virologists working with different plant viruses, and, in particular, from research on Citrus tristeza virus (CTV). A direct confirmation of such close protection came with the finding that “pre-immunization” of citrus plants with the variants of the T36 strain of CTV but not with variants of other virus strains was providing protection against a fluorescent protein-tagged T36-based recombinant virus variant. Under natural conditions close protection is functional and is closely associated both with the conservation of the CTV genome sequence and prevention of superinfection by closely similar isolates. It is suggested that the mechanism is primarily directed to prevent the danger of virus population collapse that could be expected to result through quasispecies divergence of large RNA genomes of the CTV variants continuously replicating within long-living and highly voluminous fruit trees. This review article provides an overview of the CTV cross-protection research, along with a discussion of the phenomenon in the context of the CTV biology and genetics.
Subject
Virology,Infectious Diseases
Reference101 articles.
1. The response of Star Ruby grapefruit to different Citrus tristeza virus isolates;Van Vuuren;Int. Organ. Citrus Virol. Conf. Proc.,2005
2. Mosaic diseases in the Canary Islands, West Africa and Gibraltar;McKinney;J. Agric. Res.,1929
3. Protective Inoculation against a Plant Virus
4. Practices and Precautions in the Use of Cross Protection for Plant Virus Disease Control
5. Evaluation of Induced Mutants of Papaya Ringspot Virus for Control by Cross Protection
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献