Validation of Alogo Move Pro: A GPS-Based Inertial Measurement Unit for the Objective Examination of Gait and Jumping in Horses

Author:

Guyard Kévin Cédric1,Montavon Stéphane2ORCID,Bertolaccini Jonathan1,Deriaz Michel3

Affiliation:

1. Information Science Institute GSEM/CUI, University of Geneva, 1227 Carouge, Switzerland

2. Veterinary Department of the Swiss Armed Force, 3003 Berne, Switzerland

3. HES-SO/HEG Genève, 1227 Carouge, Switzerland

Abstract

Quantitative information on how well a horse clears a jump has great potential to support the rider in improving the horse’s jumping performance. This study investigated the validation of a GPS-based inertial measurement unit, namely Alogo Move Pro, compared with a traditional optical motion capture system. Accuracy and precision of the three jumping characteristics of maximum height (Zmax), stride/jump length (lhorz), and mean horizontal speed (vhorz) were compared. Eleven horse–rider pairs repeated two identical jumps (an upright and an oxer fence) several times (n = 6 to 10) at different heights in a 20 × 60 m tent arena. The ground was a fiber sand surface. The 24 OMC (Oqus 7+, Qualisys) cameras were rigged on aluminum rails suspended 3 m above the ground. The Alogo sensor was placed in a pocket on the protective plate of the saddle girth. Reflective markers placed on and around the Alogo sensor were used to define a rigid body for kinematic analysis. The Alogo sensor data were collected and processed using the Alogo proprietary software; stride-matched OMC data were collected using Qualisys Track Manager and post-processed in Python. Residual analysis and Bland–Altman plots were performed in Python. The Alogo sensor provided measures with relative accuracy in the range of 10.5–20.7% for stride segments and 5.5–29.2% for jump segments. Regarding relative precision, we obtained values in the range of 6.3–14.5% for stride segments and 2.8–18.2% for jump segments. These accuracy differences were deemed good under field study conditions where GPS signal strength might have been suboptimal.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry

Reference14 articles.

1. Variation in Training Regimens in Professional Show jumping Yards;Nostell;Equine Vet. J.,2014

2. Days lost to Training and Competition in relation to Workload in 263 Elite Show-jumping Horses in four European Countries;Egenvall;Prev. Vet. Med.,2013

3. Do we have to redefine lameness in the era of quantitative gait anlaysis?;Pfau;Equine Vet. J.,2017

4. On the brink of daily clinical application of objective gait analysis: What evidence do we have so far from studies using an induced lameness model?;Rhodin;Equine Vet. J.,2018

5. The Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram;Dyson;Equine Vet. Educ.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3