Abstract
This paper attempts to compare three methods of testing floor slip resistance and the resulting classifications. Polished, flamed, brushed, and grained granite slabs were tested. The acceptance angle values (αob) obtained through the shod ramp test, slip resistance value (SRV), and sliding friction coefficient (μ) were compared in terms of the correlation between the series, the precision of each method, and the classification results assigned to each of the three obtained indices. It was found that the evaluation of a product for slip resistance was strongly related to the test method used and the resulting classification method. This influence was particularly pronounced for low roughness slabs. This would result in risks associated with inadequate assessments, which could affect the safe use of buildings facilities.
Funder
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference28 articles.
1. Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Councilhttps://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2011.088.01.0005.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2011:088:TOC
2. The Assesment of Floor Slip Resistancewww.ukslipresistance.org.uk
3. DIN 51130:2014 Testing of Floor Coverings-Determination of the Anti-Slip Property-Workrooms and Fields of Activities with Slip Danger-Walking Method-Ramp Test,2014
4. Relationship between Slipperiness and Other Characteristics of Stones used as Flooring Slabs
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献