Zeolite and Winery Waste as Innovative By-Product for Vineyard Soil Management
-
Published:2024-02-02
Issue:2
Volume:11
Page:29
-
ISSN:2076-3298
-
Container-title:Environments
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environments
Author:
Doni Serena1ORCID, Masciandaro Grazia1, Macci Cristina1ORCID, Manzi Davide1ORCID, Mattii Giovan Battista2ORCID, Cataldo Eleonora2ORCID, Gispert Maria3ORCID, Vannucchi Francesca1, Peruzzi Eleonora1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. National Research Council-Research Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (CNR-IRET), Via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy 2. Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry Sciences and Technologies (DAGRI), University of Florence, Viale delle Dee 30, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy 3. Soil Science Unit, Department of Chemical Engineering, Agriculture and Food Technology, University of Girona, Campus Montilivi, C/Aurélia Capmany, 61, 17003 Girona, Spain
Abstract
In semiarid environments, vine cultivation is a land use with a high impact with regard to soil erosion, loss of organic matter and biodiversity, contamination, and compaction. In addition, the wine supply chain produces a considerable quantity of organic waste, which remains as residues in the ecosystem. Within this context, we developed a sustainable vine management system to improve the efficient use of fertilisers by applying a by-product derived from the composting of winery wastes and zeolite. We evaluated the effects of the zeolite-based compost on the chemical, physical, and biochemical soil properties of a productive vineyard. Four treatments were set up and monitored for about two years. These were as follows: (1) Commercial compost (COM); (2) Zeolite (Z); (3) 30% zeolite and 70% winery waste compost (30 ZEO); (4) 10% zeolite and 90% winery waste compost (10 ZEO). The results demonstrated that the ZEO treatments could be considered a win–win solution able to improve soil water content, nutrient retention, carbon sequestration, and biochemical activity while also recycling wastes. In particular, 10 ZEO seems to be the amendment that best combines an improvement in soil biochemical properties with gradual and constant nutrient availability, thus satisfying, without exceeding, soil and plant needs.
Funder
European Commission LIFE Programme—Environment & Resources efficiency
Reference73 articles.
1. Toreti, A., Bavera, D., Acosta Navarro, J., Cammalleri, C., de Jager, A., Di Ciollo, C., Hrast Essenfelder, A., Maetens, W., Magni, D., and Masante, D. (2022). Drought in Europe August 2022, Publications Office of the European Union. 2. The soil quality concept as a framework to assess management practices in vulnerable agroecosystems: A case study in Mediterranean vineyards;Coll;Ecol. Indic.,2016 3. Tolerable versus actual soil erosion rates in;Verheijen;Europe Earth Sci. Rev.,2009 4. Influence of organic and mineral fertilisers on soil biological and physical properties;Marinari;Bioresour. Technol.,2000 5. Effects of Long-Term Continuous Cropping, Tillage, and Fertilization on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen of Black Soils in China;Liu;Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.,2005
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|