Examining the Spatial Mode, Supply–Demand Relationship, and Driving Mechanism of Urban Park Green Space: A Case Study from China

Author:

Zhao Kaixu1ORCID,Chen Chao23,Wang Jianming4,Liu Kaixi23,Wu Fengqi5,Cao Xiaoteng2

Affiliation:

1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China

2. College of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China

3. State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China

4. Xinyang Hongxin State-owned Capital Operation Group Co., Ltd., Xinyang 464100, China

5. Graduate School, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China

Abstract

Park green space is a big part of public infrastructure in cities, and how to evaluate and optimize the mismatch of urban park green space (UPGS) has become the focus of current research in academia and industry. Taking China’s 286 cities as an example, this paper used the spatial cluster and Boston Consulting Group Matrix to analyze the aggregation laws and changing modes of UPGS from 2010 to 2020, introduced the spatial mismatch model to analyze the matching of its supply and demand with GDP and population, and adopted the Geodetector to analyze the influencing factors. The findings: (1) The evolution of UPGS in China had long been characterized by a “pyramidal” pattern, i.e., limited green cities > developing green cities > steady green cities > booming green cities, exhibiting the spatial characteristics of gradient differences between the coasts and inland areas, and the aggregation of blocks in some areas. (2) The supply and demand mismatches of the UPGS were relatively stable, with negative matching being the main supply mismatch type, and positive matching being the main demand mismatch type. The contribution of supply and demand mismatches similarly showed a spatial pattern of a gradual decrease from the coast to inland and the aggregation of blocks in some areas. (3) Five types of factors played different driving roles on UPGS, with social development remaining a weak factor, and the strong factor switching from urban infrastructure to construction land scale. The interaction detection was dominated by a bilinear enhancement, with super-interaction factors changing from an output value of the tertiary industry and population urbanization rate to education expenditure in local general public budgets. (4) Based on the mismatch between the supply and demand for UPGS in China, 286 cities were classified into four types, namely a smart shrinking zone, smart growing zone, status quo zone, and overlay policy zone, and differentiated development proposals for the corresponding zoning were put forward. This paper constructed an application framework of “evolution pattern + supply demand match + driving factors + policy zoning” for UPGS at a large scale, which will effectively enhance the effective allocation of its resources across the country.

Funder

the National Key R&D Program of China

the Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference78 articles.

1. Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany;Kabisch;Landsc. Urban Plan.,2014

2. Linking public urban green spaces and human well-being: A systematic review;Altamirano;Urban For. Urban Green.,2021

3. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’;Wolch;Landsc. Urban Plan.,2014

4. A process approach to the open green space system planning;Uzun;Landsc. Ecol. Eng.,2022

5. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MHURD) (2023, July 17). Standard for Planning of Urban Green Space, Available online: https://www.mohurd.gov.cn/gongkai/zhengce/zhengcefilelib/201910/20191012_242194.html.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3