A Deep-Learning Approach to Spleen Volume Estimation in Patients with Gaucher Disease
-
Published:2023-08-18
Issue:16
Volume:12
Page:5361
-
ISSN:2077-0383
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCM
Author:
Azuri Ido1ORCID, Wattad Ameer2, Peri-Hanania Keren3, Kashti Tamar3, Rosen Ronnie3, Caspi Yaron3, Istaiti Majdolen4ORCID, Wattad Makram2, Applbaum Yaakov25, Zimran Ari45ORCID, Revel-Vilk Shoshana45ORCID, C. Eldar Yonina3
Affiliation:
1. Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel 2. Department of Radiology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel 3. Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel 4. Gaucher Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel 5. Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
Abstract
The enlargement of the liver and spleen (hepatosplenomegaly) is a common manifestation of Gaucher disease (GD). An accurate estimation of the liver and spleen volumes in patients with GD, using imaging tools such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is crucial for the baseline assessment and monitoring of the response to treatment. A commonly used method in clinical practice to estimate the spleen volume is the employment of a formula that uses the measurements of the craniocaudal length, diameter, and thickness of the spleen in MRI. However, the inaccuracy of this formula is significant, which, in turn, emphasizes the need for a more precise and reliable alternative. To this end, we employed deep-learning techniques, to achieve a more accurate spleen segmentation and, subsequently, calculate the resulting spleen volume with higher accuracy on a testing set cohort of 20 patients with GD. Our results indicate that the mean error obtained using the deep-learning approach to spleen volume estimation is 3.6 ± 2.7%, which is significantly lower than the common formula approach, which resulted in a mean error of 13.9 ± 9.6%. These findings suggest that the integration of deep-learning methods into the clinical routine practice for spleen volume calculation could lead to improved diagnostic and monitoring outcomes.
Funder
European Research Council Manya Igel Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Signal Processing
Reference53 articles.
1. Kaushansky, K., Lichtman, M., Prchal, J., Levi, M., and Burns, L. (2021). Williams Hematology, McGraw-Hill. [10th ed.]. 2. Gaucher disease and its treatment options;Bennett;Ann. Pharmacother.,2013 3. Stirnemann, J., Belmatoug, N., Camou, F., Serratrice, C., Froissart, R., Caillaud, C., Levade, T., Astudillo, L., Serratrice, J., and Brassier, A. (2017). A Review of Gaucher Disease Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation and Treatments. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 18. 4. Gaucher disease epidemiology and natural history: A comprehensive review of the literature;Nalysnyk;Hematology,2017 5. How we manage Gaucher Disease in the era of choices;Szer;Br. J. Haematol.,2018
|
|