Minimally-Invasive Diaphragmatic Plication in Patients with Unilateral Diaphragmatic Paralysis

Abstract

Background: Diaphragm eventration (DE) represents a frequent problem with consecutive major impacts on respiratory function and the quality of life of the patients. The role of diaphragmatic plication (DP) is still underestimated. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of minimally-invasive surgical diaphragmatic plication for the management of unilateral diaphragmatic eventration, to the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series reported in the literature using a non-resectional technique. Methods: All patients with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis admitted for diaphragmatic plication (DP) between January 2008 and December 2022 formed the cohort of this retrospective analysis. DP procedure was done to plicate the diaphragm without resection or replacement with synthetic materials. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I included patients who underwent DP through an open thoracotomy, and Group II included patients who underwent DP through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Data from all patients were collected prospectively and subsequently analyzed retrospectively. Patients’ characteristics, lung function tests, radiological findings, type of surgical procedures, complications, and postoperative follow-up were compared. The primary outcome measure was the postoperative result (deeper position of the paralyzed diaphragm) and improvement of dyspnea. The secondary outcome was lung function values over a long-term follow-up. Results: The study included a total of 134 patients who underwent diaphragmatic plication during the study period. 94 (71.7%) were males, mean age of 64 (SD ± 14.0). Group I (thoracotomy group) consisted of 46 patients (35 male). Group II (VATS-group) consisted of 88 patients (69 male). The majority of patients demonstrated impaired lung functions (n = 126). The mean length of diaphragmatic displacement was 8 cm (SD ± 113.8 cm). The mean duration of the entire procedure, including placement of the epidural catheter (EDC), was longer in group I than in group II (p = 0.016). This was also observed for the mean length of the surgical procedure itself (p = 0.031). Most patients in group I had EDC (n = 38) (p = 0.001). Patients in group I required more medication for pain control (p = 0.022). A lower position of the diaphragm was achieved in all patients (p < 0.001). The length of hospital stay was 7 (SD ± 4.5) days in group I vs. 4.5 (SD ± 3.2) days in group II (p = 0.036). Minor complications occurred in 3% (n = 4) in group I vs. 2% (n = 3) in group II. No mortality was observed in any of the groups. Postoperative follow-up of patients at 6, 12, and 24 months showed a significant increase in forced vital capacity (FVC) up to 25% (SD ± 10%–35%) (p = 0.019), in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) up to 20% (SD ± 12%–38%) in both groups (p = 0.026), also in the diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) up to 15% (SD ± 10%–20%) was noticed in both groups. Chronic pain symptoms were noted in 13% (n = 6) in group I vs. 2% (n = 2) in group II (p = 0.014). Except for one patient in group II, no recurrence of DE was observed. Conclusions: Diaphragm plication is an effective procedure to reduce debilitating dyspnea and improve lung function in patients suffering from diaphragm eventration. Minimally invasive diaphragmatic plication using VATS procedures is a safe and feasible procedure for the management of unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. VATS-DP is superior to open procedure in terms of pain management and length of hospital stay, hence, accelerated recovery is more likely. Careful patient selection is crucial to achieving optimal outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to validate these results.