Short and Extra Short Dental Implants in Osseous Microvascular Free Flaps: A Retrospective Case Series

Author:

Hocková Barbora1,Slávik Rastislav1,Azar Basel23,Stebel Jakub4,Poruban Dušan1,Bonfante Estevam A.5,Ewers Rolf67ORCID,Cheng Yu-Chi8,Stebel Adam14

Affiliation:

1. Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, F. D. Roosevelt University Hospital of Banská Bystrica, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

2. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic

3. Dentaris Praha Dental Clinic, Olšanská 7, 130 00 Prague, Czech Republic

4. 3S DENT Dental Clinic, Šancová Street, 831 04 Bratislava, Slovakia

5. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru 17012, SP, Brazil

6. The University Hospital for Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria

7. CMF Institute Vienna, Schumanngasse 15, 1180 Vienna, Austria

8. Harvard School of Dental Medicine, 188 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA

Abstract

There is limited information regarding implant and prosthetic survival after osseous microvascular free flap (OMFF). This case series aims to describe the placement of short and extra short implants in osseous microvascular free flaps to support prostheses, and present an up to 40-month retrospective follow-up. Short and extra short dental implants were placed in six fibula free flaps (FFF) and in two microvascular deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) flaps. In total, 27 short and extra short dental implants have been placed into two different types of free flaps. Kaplan–Meyer (K-M) survival analyses were performed to evaluate the survival and success outcomes of implants and prostheses. Out of the eight patients reconstructed with free flap, five were rehabilitated with prostheses, one patient has a temporary prosthesis, and two patients are in the process of prosthetic rehabilitation. Twenty-seven implants were followed up for up to 40 months, and K-M analyses showed 100% implant survival probability (95% confidence interval: 100%), while the implant success probability was 91.0% (95% confidence interval: 68.6–97.7%). Short and extra short dental implants placed in OMFF presented high survival and success rates in a retrospective case series after up to 40 months.

Funder

University of Palacky

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference51 articles.

1. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck reconstruction;Sahin;Acta Chir. Plast.,2021

2. Fibula Flap Reconstruction for the Mandible: Why It Is Still the Workhorse?;Su;Atlas Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am.,2023

3. Predictable dental rehabilitation in maxillomandibular reconstruction with free flaps. The role of implant guided surgery;Sobrino;Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal,2014

4. Maxillofacial Reconstruction Using Vascularized Fibula Free Flaps and Endosseous Implants;Patel;Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am.,2019

5. Evaluation of osseointegration of endosseous implants in radiated, vascularized fibula flaps to the mandible: A pilot study;Barber;J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.,1995

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3