Defining Data Model Quality Metrics for Data Vault 2.0 Model Evaluation

Author:

Helskyaho Heli12ORCID,Ruotsalainen Laura2,Männistö Tomi2

Affiliation:

1. Miracle Finland Oy, 00580 Helsinki, Finland

2. Faculty of Science, Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

Designing a database is a crucial step in providing businesses with high-quality data for decision making. The quality of a data model is the key to the quality of its data. Evaluating the quality of a data model is a complex and time-consuming task. Having suitable metrics for evaluating the quality of a data model is an essential requirement for automating the design process of a data model. While there are metrics available for evaluating data warehouse data models to some degree, there is a distinct lack of metrics specifically designed to assess how well a data model conforms to the rules and best practices of Data Vault 2.0. The quality of a Data Vault 2.0 data model is considered suboptimal if it fails to adhere to these principles. In this paper, we introduce new metrics that can be used for evaluating the quality of a Data Vault 2.0 data model, either manually or automatically. This methodology involves defining a set of metrics based on the best practices of Data Vault 2.0, evaluating five representative data models using both metrics and manual assessments made by a human expert. Finally, a comparative analysis of both evaluations was conducted to validate the consistency of the metrics with the judgments made by a human expert.

Funder

University of Helsinki

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference29 articles.

1. Inmon, W.H. (1990). Building the Data Warehouse, John Wiley & Sons. [1st ed.].

2. Lamia, Y., and Labiod, A. (2016, January 15–18). Comparative study of data warehouses modeling approaches: Inmon, Kimball and Data Vault. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on System Reliability and Science (ICSRS), Paris, France.

3. An Overview of Data Vault Methodology and Its Benefits;Inform. Econ.,2023

4. Helskyaho, H. (2023, January 15–17). Towards Automating Database Designing. Proceedings of the 34th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT), Riga, Latvia.

5. (2024, January 13). Data Vault Alliance Official Website, Data Vault 2.0 Data Modeling Specification v2.0.4. Available online: https://datavaultalliance.com/news/data-vault-2-0-data-modeling-specification-v2-0-4/.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An Evaluation Framework for Validating the Quality of a Data Vault 2.0 Data Model;2024 35th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT);2024-04-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3