Affiliation:
1. Department of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800008 Galati, Romania
2. “Paul Dimo” High School, Str. 1 Decembrie 1918 nr. 27, 800566 Galati, Romania
3. Center for Research and Training in Innovative Techniques of Applied Mathematics in Engineering, Polytechnic University of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
4. Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment, “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800008 Galati, Romania
Abstract
We present a comparative study aiming to determine the most efficient multivariate model screening for the main drugs of abuse based on their ATR-FTIR spectra. A preliminary statistical analysis of selected spectra data extracted from the public SWGDRUG IR Library was first performed. The results corroborated those of an exploratory analysis that was based on several dimensionality reduction methods, i.e., Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Independent Component Analysis (ICA), and autoencoders. Then, several machine learning methods, i.e., Support Vector Machines (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), were used to assign the drug class membership. In order to account for the stochastic nature of these machine learning methods, both models were evaluated 10 times on a randomly distributed subset of the whole SWGDRUG IR Library, and the results were compared in detail. Finally, their performance in assigning the class identity of three classes of drugs of abuse, i.e., hallucinogenic (2C-x, DOx, and NBOMe) amphetamines, cannabinoids, and opioids, were compared based on confusion matrices and various classification parameters, such as balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The advantages of each of the illicit drug-detecting systems and their potential as forensic screening tools used in field scenarios are also discussed.
Reference33 articles.
1. Toxicity of amphetamines: An update;Carvalho;Arch. Toxicol.,2012
2. 2C or not 2C: Phenethylamine designer drug review;Dean;J. Med. Toxicol.,2013
3. Trachsel, D., Lehmann, D., and Enzensperger, C. (2013). Phenethylamine: Von der Struktur zur Funktion, Nachtschatten-Verlag.
4. Herrmann, E.S., Johnson, P.S., Johnson, M.W., and Vandrey, R. (2016). Neuropathology of Drug Addictions and Substance Misuse, Elsevier.
5. NBOMes–highly potent and toxic alternatives of LSD;Zawilska;Front. Neurosci.,2020