Equivalent Exchange Method for Decision-Making in Case of Alternatives with Incomparable Attributes

Author:

Kravchenko TatianaORCID,Shevgunov TimofeyORCID

Abstract

The paper is focused on searching for novel methods aimed at improving the performance and usability of a common decision-making process where a panel of experts are assisted by specialized software systems. An equivalent exchange method (EEM) is considered in the paper as a potential candidate for a versatile method applicable in expert decision-making process for solving problems in various subject domains. The method is formally described in the paper in the form of an iterative algorithm where each iteration leads to the reduce in the number of alternatives under consideration until it converges to the preferable one. The key feature of EEM consists in the fact that the original comparison between multiple alternatives described by many attributes measured in different units is replaced by the sequence of simple exchanges between pairs of alternatives where only two attributes are engaged at once. The numerical example illustrating the full run of the algorithm is thoroughly described, so the actions performed in the steps of the algorithm are explained. The case of the successful implementation of EEM as the module of Expert Decision Support System is also presented.

Funder

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Engineering

Reference52 articles.

1. John, S., Ralph, L., and Raiffa, H. (2015). Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions, Harvard Business Review Press. [1st ed.].

2. Keeney, R., and Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Cambridge University Press.

3. SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement;Edwards;Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.,1994

4. Larichev, O.I., and Moshkovich, H.M. (1997). Verbal Decision Analysis for Unstructured Problems, Springer.

5. Ranking Requirements Using MoSCoW Methodology in Practice;Silhavy;Proceedings of the Cybernetics Perspectives in Systems CSOC,2022

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3