Factors Associated with Uptake of No-Cost Safety Modifications to Home Access Steps: Implications for Equity and Policy

Author:

Keall Michael D.1ORCID,Pierse Nevil1ORCID,Cunningham Chris W.2ORCID,Baker Michael G.1ORCID,Bierre Sarah1,Howden-Chapman Philippa1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. He Kainga Oranga/Housing and Health Research Programme, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, P.O. Box 7343, Wellington 6242, New Zealand

2. Research Centre for Hauora & Health, Massey University, P.O. Box 756, Wellington 6140, New Zealand

Abstract

(1) Background: Fall injuries in the home present a major health burden internationally for all age groups. One effective intervention to prevent falls is home modification, but safety is only increased if opportunities to install safety modifications are taken up. This study sought to identify factors that may lead to a higher uptake of no-cost home modifications when these are offered to people living in the community. (2) Methods: We studied 1283 houses in the New Zealand cities of New Plymouth and Wellington. Using logistic regression, we modelled the odds of uptake according to the number of access steps, the provider who was undertaking the modifications, occupant ethnicity, prior fall injury history, and age group. (3) Results: Homes with older residents (age 65+) had higher uptake rates (35% vs. 27% for other homes). Larger numbers of access steps were associated with higher uptake rates. There was indicative evidence that homes with Indigenous Māori occupants had a higher uptake of the modifications for one of the two providers, but not the other. (4) Conclusions: No-cost home safety modifications offered via cold calling are likely to have relatively low uptake rates but the households that do consent to the modifications may be those who are more likely to benefit from the concomitant increased safety.

Funder

Health Research Council of New Zealand

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference33 articles.

1. (2020). Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Results, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Available online: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool.

2. ACC (2020). Injury Statistics Tool, ACC.

3. Blakely, T. (2002). Proceedings of the First Annual CPHR Symposium in Health Research and Policy, Massey University.

4. Home modifications to reduce injuries from falls in the home injury prevention intervention (HIPI) study: A cluster-randomised controlled trial;Keall;Lancet,2015

5. Association between the number of home injury hazards and home injury;Keall;Accid. Anal. Prev.,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3