Digital and Virtual Technologies for Work-Related Biomechanical Risk Assessment: A Scoping Review

Author:

Anacleto Filho Paulo C.123ORCID,Colim Ana13ORCID,Jesus Cristiano124ORCID,Lopes Sérgio Ivan245ORCID,Carneiro Paula1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ALGORITMI Research Center/LASI, University of Minho, 4710-057 Guimarães, Portugal

2. CiTin—Centro de Interface Tecnológico Industrial, 4970-786 Arcos de Valdevez, Portugal

3. DTx—Digital Transformation CoLAB, University of Minho, 4710-057 Guimarães, Portugal

4. ADiT—Lab, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal

5. IT—Instituto de Telecomunicações, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-164 Aveiro, Portugal

Abstract

The field of ergonomics has been significantly shaped by the advent of evolving technologies linked to new industrial paradigms, often referred to as Industry 4.0 (I4.0) and, more recently, Industry 5.0 (I5.0). Consequently, several studies have reviewed the integration of advanced technologies for improved ergonomics in different industry sectors. However, studies often evaluate specific technologies, such as extended reality (XR), wearables, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaborative robot (cobot), and their advantages and problems. In this sense, there is a lack of research exploring the state of the art of I4.0 and I5.0 virtual and digital technologies in evaluating work-related biomechanical risks. Addressing this research gap, this study presents a comprehensive review of 24 commercial tools and 10 academic studies focusing on work-related biomechanical risk assessment using digital and virtual technologies. The analysis reveals that AI and digital human modelling (DHM) are the most commonly utilised technologies in commercial tools, followed by motion capture (MoCap) and virtual reality (VR). Discrepancies were found between commercial tools and academic studies. However, the study acknowledges limitations, including potential biases in sample selection and search methodology. Future research directions include enhancing transparency in commercial tool validation processes, examining the broader impact of emerging technologies on ergonomics, and considering human-centred design principles in technology integration. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the evolving landscape of biomechanical risk assessment.

Funder

FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

“Missão Interface”

FCT

Norte Portugal Regional Operational Program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference90 articles.

1. El A Literature Review on the Evolution of Lean Manufacturing;Abbadi;J. Syst. Manag. Sci.,2020

2. Thompson, K. (2005). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, Taylor and Francis.

3. Performance Optimisation of Pick and Transport Robot in a Picker to Parts Order Picking System: A Human-Centric Approach;Vijayakumar;Int. J. Prod. Res.,2023

4. Human Factors and Ergonomics for Primary Care;Bowie;Educ. Prim. Care,2016

5. IEA (2024, January 25). What Is Ergonomics (HFE)?. Available online: https://iea.cc/about/what-is-ergonomics/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3