Which Technologies Make Australian Farm Machinery Safer? A Decision Support Tool for Agricultural Safety Effectiveness

Author:

Latham Amity12ORCID,Najdovski Zoran13,Bartel Rebecca1,Cotton Jacqueline12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia

2. Western District Health Service, Tyers St, Hamilton, VIC 3300, Australia

3. Institute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation, 75 Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia

Abstract

This project combined systems engineers, farm safety researchers, work health and safety inspectorate and policymakers with the aim of designing a way in which to reduce fatal farm injury caused by run-overs and roll-overs by tractors and side-by-side vehicles. The team made comparisons between farm machinery and powered mobile plant that is used in the industrial manufacturing, warehousing and logistics, mining, and construction sectors. Current and emerging safety technologies and engineering solutions were collated. Safety standards, legislated engineering controls, retrofit designs, and known ways in which farmers’ workaround safety features were considered. These elements were used as criteria to propose a way to resolve which safety technologies or engineering controls should be recommended for aftermarket retrofitting or incorporated at the original equipment manufacturer design stage. The concept of measuring safety effectiveness to prevent fatal farm injury emerged. This developed into a score sheet and a corresponding matrix to highlight engineering strength and industry acceptance. The project resulted in the conceptual design of the agricultural safety effectiveness score (ASES). The next phase is a multi-stakeholder validation process and a protocol for the scoring system. It requires a hypothesis to test the theory that when safety technologies and engineering solutions are mature in other industries or if they are associated with agricultural productivity gains, their adoption into the agricultural sector is more likely, which in turn will reduce the incidence of tractor and side-by-side run-overs and roll-overs on farms.

Funder

WorkSafe Victoria

Deakin University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference29 articles.

1. Baker, W., Day, L., Stephen, K., Voaklander, D., Ozanne-Smith, J., Dosman, J., and Hagel, L. (2008). Making Farm Machinery Safer: Lessons from Injured Farmers, ACT.

2. Farmsafe Australia (2021). Education Fund Strategy 2020–2021, Farmsafe Australia.

3. A review of farm tractor overturning accidents and safety;Abubakar;Pertanika J. Sci. Technol.,2010

4. Farmsafe Australia (2022). Safer Farms 2022 Agricultural Injury and Fatality Trend Report, Farmsafe Australia.

5. Safe Work Australia (2023). Work-Related Injury Fatalities Key WHS Statistics Australia 2022, Safe Work Australia.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3