Inertial Motion Capturing in Ergonomic Workplace Analysis: Assessing the Correlation between RULA, Upper-Body Posture Deviations and Musculoskeletal Discomfort
Author:
Simon Steven1ORCID, Dully Jonas1ORCID, Dindorf Carlo1, Bartaguiz Eva1, Walle Oliver2, Roschlock-Sachs Ilsemarie3, Fröhlich Michael1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Sports Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany 2. Health Management, Campus Saarbrücken, University of Applied Sciences (DHfPG), 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany 3. Medical Department, Hager Group, 66440 Blieskastel, Germany
Abstract
(1) Background: Mobile movement analysis systems, for example, those based on Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs), enable digital real-time methods of collecting data in workplace ergonomics, but the relationship between observational method scores such as Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), upper-body posture, and their influence on musculoskeletal discomfort, has not yet been well investigated. This field study aimed to evaluate the relationship of these variables in two different target groups: production and office workers. (2) Methods: There were 64 subjects (44 men and 20 women) participating. Data collection was divided into two categories: (1) Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) (n = 64) and 3D stereophotogrammetric posture analysis (n = 58), and (2) Investigation of workload via IMU-based motion capture (MoCap) and the Borg CR-10 body map (n = 24). Correlation tests and regression analysis were performed using SPSS and MATLAB software to examine the relationship between the upper-body posture and RULA. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was applied to examine group differences. (3) Results: The findings did not support the authors’ hypothesis that posture risk at work significantly correlates with static upper-body posture and musculoskeletal discomfort. Pelvic tilt had a weak but significant influence on RULA. The data revealed interesting trends in physical exertion, musculoskeletal discomfort, and differences between production and office workers. However, the statistical analysis did not support this. Such approaches have the potential to enhance the accuracy of assessment outcomes and, in turn, provide a stronger foundation for enhancing ergonomic conditions.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference65 articles.
1. Evaluation of the working posture and prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among medical laboratory technicians;Maulik;J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil.,2014 2. Yang, F., Di, N., Guo, W.-W., Ding, W.-B., Jia, N., Zhang, H., Li, D., Wang, D., Wang, R., and Zhang, D. (2023). The prevalence and risk factors of work related musculoskeletal disorders among electronics manufacturing workers: A cross-sectional analytical study in China. BMC Public Health, 23. 3. An ergonomic intervention to relieve musculoskeletal symptoms of assembly line workers at an electronic parts manufacturer in Iran;Daneshmandi;Work,2018 4. Epidemiology of work-related musculoskeletal disorders;Bonfiglioli;Curr. Opin. Epidemiol. Public Health,2022 5. Disparate exposure to physically demanding working conditions in France;Havet;Rev. D’épidémiol. Santé Publique,2020
|
|