Abstract
Many decision-making situations require the evaluation of several voters or agents. In a situation where voters evaluate candidates, the question arises of how best to aggregate evaluations so as to compare the candidates. The aim of this work is to propose a method of aggregating the evaluations of the voters, which has outstanding properties and serve as a potential evaluative tool in many contexts. Ordered weighted averages is a family of rules appropriate for studying this problem. In this paper, I propose as a solution an ordered weighted average that satisfies compelling properties and whose weights are derived from the binomial distribution.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Subject
General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Reference17 articles.
1. The case for utilitarian voting;Homo Oeconomicus,2005
2. Voting with evaluations: Characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting;J. Math. Econ.,2018
3. Balinski, M.L., and Laraki, R. (2011). Majority Judgement: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing, The MIT Press.
4. The threshold aggregation;Econ. Lett.,2010
5. Yager, R.R., and Kacprzyk, J. (1997). The Ordered Weighted Average Operators: Theory and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers.