Subbasin Spatial Scale Effects on Hydrological Model Prediction Uncertainty of Extreme Stream Flows in the Omo Gibe River Basin, Ethiopia

Author:

Gebeyehu Bahru M.ORCID,Jabir Asie K.,Tegegne Getachew,Melesse Assefa M.ORCID

Abstract

Quantification of hydrologic model prediction uncertainty for various flow quantiles is of great importance for water resource planning and management. Thus, this study is designed to assess the effect of subbasin spatial scale on the hydrological model prediction uncertainty for different flow quantiles. The Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), a geographic information system (GIS) interfaced hydrological model, was used in this study. Here, the spatial variations within the sub-basins of the Omo Gibe River basin in Ethiopia’s Abelti, Wabi, and Gecha watersheds from 1989 to 2020 were examined. The results revealed that (1) for the Abelti, Wabi, and Gecha watersheds, SWAT was able to reproduce the observed hydrograph with more than 85%, 82%, and 73% accuracy in terms of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), respectively; (2) the variation in the spatial size of the subbasin had no effect on the overall flow simulations. However, the reproduction of the flow quantiles was considerably influenced by the subbasin spatial scales; (3) the coarser subbasin spatial scale resulted in the coverage of most of the observations. However, the finer subbasin spatial scale provided the best simulation closer to the observed stream flow pattern; (4) the SWAT model performed much better in recreating moist, high, and very-high flows than it did in replicating dry, low, and very-low flows in the studied watersheds; (5) a smaller subbasin spatial scale (towards to distributed model) may better replicate low flows, while a larger subbasin spatial scale (towards to lumped model) enhances high flow replication precision. Thus, it is crucial to investigate the subbasin spatial scale to reproduce the peak and low flows; (6) in this study, the best subbasin spatial scales for peak and low flows were found to be 79–98% and 29–42%, respectively. Hence, it is worthwhile to investigate the proper subbasin spatial scales in reproducing various flow quantiles toward sustainable management of floods and drought.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference81 articles.

1. Influence of hydrologic and anthropogenic drivers on emerging organic contaminants in drinking water sources in the Susquehanna River Basin;Kibuye;Chemosphere,2020

2. SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation;Arnold;Trans. ASABE,2012

3. An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation;Butts;J. Hydrol.,2004

4. A review on hydrological models;Devia;Aquat. Procedia,2015

5. Gao, H., Tang, Q., Shi, X., Zhu, C., Bohn, T., Su, F., Pan, M., Sheffield, J., Lettenmaier, D., and Wood, E. (2010). Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for Terrestrial Water Cycle Data Records, Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268367169_Water_Budget_Record_from_Variable_Infiltration_Capacity_VIC_Model.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3