Affiliation:
1. Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Rome, Italy
Abstract
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) are persistent organic pollutants still widespread in the environment and in the food chain. Both groups of these synthetic xenobiotics consist of 209 possible congeners depending on the number and position of halogens. PCBs with the same number of chlorine atoms and PBBs with the same number of bromine atoms are isomers: ten different degrees of halogenation are allowed, which results in a lot of existing isomers for both groups. The isomers have perfect correspondence in the number and type of atoms with differences only in positioning, so their mass spectra are expected to be identical with a consequent significant analytical problem in the event of coelution of the chromatographic peaks. This is not always the case, since the mass spectrometric ortho effect is capable of effectively discriminating many coeluting PCB or PBB isomers, although not all possible ones. The present paper investigates, for the first time, the reliability of qualitative and quantitative analysis by using the ortho effect: this was conducted through targeted experimental measurements on real samples of food by using different detectors. In this context, it is shown how to recognize the presence of a PCB that does not have the ortho effect when coeluting with an isomer that has. This is an important aspect that has never been studied until now. The ortho effect is extremely simple to operate once the ordinary GC-MS runs have been performed: the analyst only needs to recheck the mass spectrum for measuring the intensity of the first dehalogenation ion. The topic is of practical relevance since two different isomers can have different health hazards, and the presence of a very toxic isomer could be masked by a less toxic one. The same mass spectrometric ortho effect also deals with PXBs (i.e., mixed poly-brominated/chlorinated biphenyls), which are emerging contaminants.
Reference42 articles.
1. (2024, June 21). Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Polybrominated Biphenyls. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Available online: https://publications.iarc.fr/131.
2. Background levels of polychlorinated biphenyls in the U.S. population;Hopf;Sci. Total Environ.,2009
3. Previously identified and unidentified polybrominated biphenyl congeners in serum from people living in an electronic waste dismantling area in China;Wang;Chemosphere,2021
4. Serum polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and thyroid function among Michigan adults several decades after the 1973–1974 PBB contamination of livestock feed;Jacobson;Environ. Health Persp.,2017
5. (2024, June 26). Stockholm Convention, Alternatives to POPs, Chemicals Listed in Annex A, Hexabromobiphenyl. Available online: https://chm.pops.int/Implementation/Alternatives/AlternativestoPOPs/ChemicalslistedinAnnexA/HBB/tabid/5860/Default.aspx.