Abstract
A number of (hetero)boranes are known in which a main group atom X ‘bridges’ a B—B connectivity in the open face, and in such species X has previously been described as simply a bridge or, alternatively, as a vertex in a larger cluster. In this study we describe an approach to distinguish between these options based on identifying the best fit of the experimental {Bx} cluster fragment with alternate exemplar {Bx} fragments derived from DFT-optimized [BnHn]2− models. In most of the examples studied atom X is found to be better regarded as a vertex, having ‘a ‘verticity’ of ca. 60–65%. Consideration of our results leads to the suggestion that the radial electron contribution from X to the overall skeletal electron count is more significant than the tangential contribution.
Subject
Chemistry (miscellaneous),Analytical Chemistry,Organic Chemistry,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Molecular Medicine,Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference30 articles.
1. Stock, A. (1933). Hydrides of Boron and Silicon, Cornell University Press.
2. Lipscomb, W.N. (1963). Boron Hydrides, W.A. Benjamin.
3. Hawthorne, M.F. (1967). The Preparation of Boron and Its Compounds, Muetterties, E.L., Ed., John and Wiley and Sons.
4. Carboranes and boranes, polyhedra and polyhedral fragments;Williams;Inorg. Chem.,1971
5. Boranes and heteroboranes: A paradigm for the electron requirements of clusters?;Rudolph;Acc. Chem. Res.,1976