Different Size Formulations of Fluopyram: Preparation, Antifungal Activity, and Accumulation in the Fungal Pathogen Botrytis cinerea
-
Published:2023-08-17
Issue:16
Volume:28
Page:6099
-
ISSN:1420-3049
-
Container-title:Molecules
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Molecules
Author:
Wang Yinmin123, Zhang Sida3, Xu Yong12, Li Haiyun3, Zhang Ruihua3, Chen Dong3, Xu Jianfu3, Wu Xuemin12
Affiliation:
1. Innovation Center of Pesticide Research, Department of Applied Chemistry, College of Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China 2. Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Pest Chemical Control, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China 3. State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing 102205, China
Abstract
Nanotechnology is revolutionizing the efficient production and sustainable development of modern agriculture. Understanding the pesticide activity of both nano- and conventional methods is useful for developing new pesticide formulations. In this study, three solid fluopyram formulations with varying particle sizes were developed, and the mechanisms underlying the difference in the antifungal activity among these formulations were investigated. Wet media milling combined with freeze drying was used to prepare fluopyram nanoparticles (FLU-NS) and a micron-sized solid formulation (FLU-MS), and a jet grinding mill was employed to fabricate fluopyram wettable powder (FLU-WP). The mean particle sizes of FLU-NS, FLU-MS, and FLU-WP were 366.8 nm, 2.99 μm, and 10.16 μm, respectively. Notably, FLU-NS displayed a toxicity index against Botrytis cinerea (gray mold) that was approximately double those of FLU-MS and FLU-WP. Similar trends were noticed in the antifungal tests on Alternaria solani. The uptake of FLU-NS by B. cinerea was approximately twice that of FLU-MS and FLU-WP, indicating that fluopyram nanoparticles are more easily taken up by the pathogen (B. cinerea), and display better bioactivity than the larger fluopyram particles. Therefore, the nanosizing of pesticides appears to be a viable strategy to enhance efficiency without increasing the amount of pesticide used.
Funder
National Key Research and Development Program of China National Forestry and Grassland Administration of China
Subject
Chemistry (miscellaneous),Analytical Chemistry,Organic Chemistry,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Molecular Medicine,Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference40 articles.
1. Kumar, R., Kumar, N., Rajput, V.D., Mandzhieva, S., Minkina, T., Saharan, B.S., Kumar, D., Sadh, P.K., and Duhan, J.S. (2022). Advances in Biopolymeric Nanopesticides: A New Eco-Friendly/Eco-Protective Perspective in Precision Agriculture. Nanomaterials, 12. 2. Adhesive and Stimulus-Responsive Polydopamine-Coated Graphene Oxide System for Pesticide-Loss Control;Tong;J. Agric. Food Chem.,2018 3. Agricultural Nanotechnologies: What are the current possibilities?;Parisi;Nano Today,2015 4. Toxicity of carbon nanomaterials to plants, animals and microbes: Recent progress from 2015-present;Chen;Chemosphere,2018 5. Nanotechnologies in agriculture: New tools for sustainable development;Chen;Trends Food Sci Tech.,2011
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|